hearing aid Complaint
Respond to this Complaint
This section is for replying to a complaint. You may reply to a complaint if your reply offers productive insight that fits into the following categories: Consumer Comment, Consumer Suggestion, Employee of the Company, Employee of the Company with inside information, Ex-employee, Individual reported, and Company Owner.
Respond to this Hearing Aid consumer complaint!
Members login at the top of this page. Not a member? Register with LawCash.com using the form above.
If you have a similar complaint, rather than replying, you should write and document your own complaint by clicking here. This will help by showing the extent of consumer complaints against a given company.
Your reply should not include Unlawful, slanderous, defamatory, false, obscene, indecent, lewd, pornographic, violent, abusive, insulting, threatening and harassing comments, which are not appropriate in the Lawcash.com forums and are forbidden. Advertisements, solicitations and similar commercial materials are not allowed. Any form of direct or indirect personal attack or harassment or any comment that calls for unlawful or illegal behavior or might result in harm to others is prohibited. For more information on the terms of using Lawcash.com, click here. Your information is held strictly confidential - however, your first name, city and state will appear on the website associated with your reply.
hearing aid - improper technology
I can prove how wearing hearing aids after 40 years can cause damage concerning the inside of my body (vibration intolerances resulting from manufactured vibration production). I can no longer wear hearing aids plus I have to keep my ears plugged from everything that is in the air. Intolerances are related with high frequencies and there are too many vibrations in the air that include these frequencies. I have to approach this issue from a physics standpoint concerning forced movement being injected into the body directly via the ear. Since I was born with a hearing loss, my body was already unable to process vibrations. This means that forced vibrations produced by hearing aids can (vibrations that you can't see: you can't see sound) overpower the mechanics of hearing (there isn't a single person that understands all mechanics related with this) to a point where it is possible for the forced vibrations to cause something inside of your body to break (in my case, it is found that I have had a missing superior semicircular canal located in just one ear diagnosed with no known cause (there is a cause for everything): I have a bilateral sensorineural hearing loss). My eyes have been moving involuntarily since the 1990s because of the vibration intolerances. The last time that I reported this back in 2004, the doctor dismissed direction concerning evaluation (I have proof where I wrote it down plus his answer concerning not being aware of it. This is after I wrote it.). The direction that I received instead was to keep having two digital hearing aids adjusted to no avail. I had to stop everything about my life and jump into this industry and become an unpaid member. I had to discover what test was properly needed concerning my report. It took two more years before I finally received the proper test showing how I have increased intracranial pressure that has been causing involuntary eye movement resulting from having a missing bone. I also have proof knowing that my body has been effected by inaudible frequencies. This means that with my hearing loss, I haven't been able to hear these frequencies even though I could feel them. This means that an audiogram cannot be used solely to evaluate body intolerances. The hearing aid industry conveniently overlooks these reports by making you think that they can make a determination based on using their naked eye during evaluations. You can't see sound plus you can't see movement inside of your body. This also means that the doctor was purposely ignorant after I my report. I have had inner ear surgery to plug the canal to try and stop the increased fluid movement because of the missing bone. This was last May. The surgery improved my hearing meaning the vibration intolerances have been intensified. I can now hear and feel the intolerance during an audiogram whereas before, I could only feel it. At this point, I also have a more generalized increase concerning intracrancial pressure because my body was opened up because of the surgery. My problem was more localized before that meaning all that I had to do was do the same thing that I am doing now by not amplifying intolerances and plugging my ears from the air. The increased intracranial pressure includes the vibration intolerance IN ADDITION to feeling the fluid movement on the left side of my head. This means that all related muscles are included in the increase now whereas before, all I had to do was plug my ears. I'm involved with a nationally known scientific expert concerning report and he has confirmed with me that I have a rare situation (within the hearing aid industry). I also know that my rare situation has a high probability that I am one of the beginning reported results after having worn manufactured forced movement for 40 years. This means that there are some people already that do not wear them but don't understand why they can't tolerate them whereas I know exactly what is happening. Plus, there is going to be an influx coming from some people with the same problem. There are already some people outside of the hearing aid industry that have been shown to have conditions result from being around vibration sources. I feel that I need to be responsible by seeking help to help others with what I know.
If you're also a victim of this company, then submit your own hearing aid complaint letter




