Simpson v State of Alaska

WIN AN iPOD TOUCH!*
Sign Up For Our FREE Weekly Alerts




 
General Alerts
General Alerts include all recent cases, recalls and complaints.
Automotive Alerts
Make sure YOUR car has not been recalled and you are safe.
Family Alerts
Keep track of recalls and cases that affect you and your children.
Health and Medical Alerts
Are the prescription drugs and medical devices YOU use safe?
Consumer Alerts
Get notified about recalled products around your home.
Environmental Alerts
Keep up with pollution and contamination that may affect you.
Financial Alerts
Keep an eye on your investments.
 
 

Alaskan Senior Citizens File Suit to Force State to Continue Longevity Bonus Program

Case ID: 3088
Category: Government
 
Last Update: 01/26/2004
Country:
 

A class action has been filed against the state of Alaska and its governor, Frank Murkowski, on behalf of Alaskan senior citizens who allege that the state made a legal obligation to Alaskan seniors when it created the Longevity Bonus program in 1972, and when it agreed to phase out the program in 1993—an obligation that can't be crossed out with a line-item veto pen. The action seeks an order that will reinstate the program for those recipients who are currently eligible for bonus checks.

The action alleges that the promise amounts to a contract, and the governor's line-item veto of the $46 million program last year does not exempt the state from its legal obligation. The bonus apparently provided some 18,000 seniors with payments averaging something over $2,500 per year.

Helen Simpson, 84, of Anchorage, is one of the plaintiffs named in the lawsuit. She alleges that the governor's action betrays those who have become dependent on the monthly checks. The action translates her anger into legal arguments that could test the governor's line-item veto authority.

Since the state legislature never got rid of the program, a court order overturning the veto would essentially restart it. The governor's action merely crossed off the money for it in the budget— it is still authorized in state law, just not funded. Restarting the program would mean a continuing cost to the state of $46 million a year, which would diminish as participants in the program pass away.

Browse Class Actions in the following categories.

 
GO
 
 
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash || Privacy Policy || Terms & Conditions
LawCash® is a service of skyMedia, llc © 2000 - 2010 Copyright. All rights reserved skyMedia, llc.