DuPont Consumers v E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Brookdale International Systems Inc.

WIN AN iPOD TOUCH!*
Sign Up For Our FREE Weekly Alerts




 
General Alerts
General Alerts include all recent cases, recalls and complaints.
Automotive Alerts
Make sure YOUR car has not been recalled and you are safe.
Family Alerts
Keep track of recalls and cases that affect you and your children.
Health and Medical Alerts
Are the prescription drugs and medical devices YOU use safe?
Consumer Alerts
Get notified about recalled products around your home.
Environmental Alerts
Keep up with pollution and contamination that may affect you.
Financial Alerts
Keep an eye on your investments.
 
 

Lawyers File Class Action Over DuPont Fire Safety Hood

Case ID: 4825
Category: Consumer Products
 
Last Update: 06/02/2006
Country:
 

Attorneys recently filed a lawsuit seeking class-action status against E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. and one of the company's Canadian subsidiaries in response to a plan to provide prorated refunds to customers who purchased potentially hazardous fire safety devices that were recently recalled.

In April, Vancouver, British Columbia-based Brookdale International Systems Inc., a division of DuPont Canada, announced that it was recalling nearly 300,000 EVAC-U8 and EVAC+ emergency escape smoke hoods after tests showed the products did not work properly, potentially exposing users to carbon monoxide and other airborne toxins.

The single use, personal air filtration systems were marketed as being effective for escaping fires and other smoke emergencies, promising customers 15 minutes of protection from smoke and other toxins. Each unit was sold with either a five- or eight-year shelf-life warranty. In announcing the recall, however, Brookdale offered only to refund the prorated value left on the warranty.

"The shelf-life of a defective product should not be a deciding factor in issuing refunds," said one of the attorneys, who is seeking class-action status for every customer who purchased the devices. "Whether one of these hoods was purchased five days or five years ago doesn't change the fact that using it can leave trusting consumers in a dangerous predicament. Customers should not be penalized because they were lucky enough not to discover first-hand that these products do not work as advertised" said one of the handling attorneys.

In 2002, Brookdale offered full refunds on more than 27,000 hoods purchased by customers who mistakenly believed they would be effective against tear gas or chemical weapons. Four years later, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a "Suspend Use" advisory on March 8, 2006. The EVAC- U8 and EVAC+ hoods were sold on Web sites, by safety products retailers, in catalogs and at travel stores for $75 to $150.

The lawsuit is open to any person that purchased a recalled EVAC- U8 and EVAC+ hoods manfactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

Browse Class Actions in the following categories.

 
GO
 
 
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash || Privacy Policy || Terms & Conditions
LawCash® is a service of skyMedia, llc © 2000 - 2010 Copyright. All rights reserved skyMedia, llc.