|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 5221 | Stocks | 11/26/2008
According to a press release dated November 14, 2008, the complaint charges the Company and its Chief Executive Officer with violations of the Exchange Act. Internap provides Internet connectivity solutions to business customers who require business applications such as e-commerce, video and audio streaming, customer relationship management, voice over Internet protocol, virtual private networks, and supply chain management.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's alleged successful integration of acquired businesses into its network and that such integration purportedly improved performance for customers, helped increase the Company's customer base and resulted in record revenues. According to the complaint, however, the company allegedly hid from the public that its customers were experiencing sever network outages and that several hundred customers had requested account credits. The complaint alleges that because of defendants' false and misleading statements, Internap's stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period. On March 18, 2008, the Company announced, inter alia, that it would delay filing its Form 10-K Annual Report, that it would send refunds to several hundred customers and that service outages caused a reduction of revenue and caused customers to request credits. On the following day, March 19, 2008, Internap's stock price plummeted from $6.12 per share to a closing price of $4.09 per share, a decline of approximately 33%.
Register your Internap Network Services ComplaintIf you or someone you know has been affected by this case, you may qualify for a money settlement as the result of your financial/economic or other damages that may be awarded either prior to a lawsuit or after the initiation of a lawsuit either currently in progress or filed just for you, possibly a class action lawsuit. Please simply register your complaint by clicking here for Internap Network Services, or click the red "submit" button on this page, and a lawyer will review your Internap Network Services complaint. By submitting your complaint, you are asking lawyers to contact you. You are under no obligation to accept their services and you are free to choose which lawyer you want to work with. Lawyers are usually paid out of the proceeds of the settlement or verdict rendered - the lawyers work on "contingency" by fronting the costs of your lawsuit based on their belief that they will recover a settlement for you. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Stocks Cases of Interest The parties have reached a tentative $10 million settlement of several class actions filed against network security firm CyberGuard Corporation (Nasdaq: CGFW, formerly AMEX: CFW) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 26 and August 21, 1998. The parties have not announced further details of the settlement, including the deadline for filing claims. Several class actions have been filed against Italian dairy giant Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A (Pink: PARAF.PK, formerly OTCBB: PARAF) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 5, 1999, and December 29, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. The class has been certified in an action filed against Kmart Corporation board members and executives on behalf of current and former Kmart employees who had more than $100 million of the discount chain's stock in their 401(k) retirement plans when the company went bankrupt. The action alleges that the defendants violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by abrogating their fiduciary duties to plan participants. Persons eligible to take part in the action should contact attorneys for the class. According to a press release dated December 13, 2008, the complaint alleges violations of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and names as defendants China Organic and certain of its officers and directors. Several class actions have been filed against bulk transporter Quality Distribution, Inc. (Nasdaq:QLTY) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 7, 2003, and February 2, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. A class action has been filed against TyCom, Ltd. (formerly NYSE: TCM), Tyco International, Ltd. (NYSE: TYC), and other parties by TyCom stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 26, 2000, and December 18, 2001. |
|
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
