|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 5128 | Stocks | 07/21/2008
The complaint charges certain officers and directors of the underwriter Credit Suisse, as well as credit ratings institutions Moody's and DBRS with misleading investors in regards to the risk levels of Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates. Plaintiffs allege that the Underwriter did not use proper due diligence in assessing the securities and that the ratings agencies assigned the securities the highest ratings levels despite being tied to the high-risk subprime market.
The complaint was originally filed in the Supreme Court in the State of New York on June 3, 2008 but was removed to the Southern District Court of New York after a motion filed by Moody's.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Stocks Cases of Interest According to the Complaint, Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of all persons similarly situated, (the "Class"), other than Defendants and their affiliates, who (1) purchased or otherwise acquired the common shares of EnerNOC, Inc. ("EnerNOC" or the "Company) between November 1, 2007, through and including, February 27, 2008, (the "Class Period"); and/or (2) purchased or otherwise acquired EnerNOC common stock pursuant to Prospectus on Form 424B4 filed November 13, 2007 ("November 13 Prospectus") between November 13, 2007 through and including February 27, 2008, for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants' violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
A class action has been filed against Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. (NYSE: OPY), it’s subsidiaries, and certain of its individual funds, officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between August 31, 1999 and March 22, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of persons who acquired the common stock of EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("EPIX" or "Company"), between July 10, 2003 and January 14, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action has been filed against National Australia Bank, Ltd. (NYSE: NAB) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the bank's ADRs between April 1, 1999, and September 3, 2001. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their ADRs. On April 30, 2008, a notice of motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsels was filed by certain groups and individuals. As a result, an order granting motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels was entered on April 30, 2008.
A class action has been filed against diversified manufacturing and service company Tyco International, Ltd (NYSE: TYC) and its CEO by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 30, 2002, and March 12, 2003. |
IT'S FREE
|
Class Action Lawsuit Center ||
Product Recall Center ||
Consumer Complaint Center ||
About LawCash
Link Exchange
Privacy Policy ||
Legal Policies ||
Terms & Conditions ||
Website Advertising Policy ||
Site Map ||
Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
