Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Wachovia Corporation

Report Fraud
Case ID: 5120 | Stocks | 07/21/2008

According to a law firm press release, a class action has been filed against Wachovia Corporation on June 9, 2008.

In summary, the complaint alleges that Defendants misled investors by falsely representing that Wachovia had strict and selective underwriting and loan origination practices and a conservative lending approach that set it apart from other lenders. Such reassurances were repeated by defendants throughout the Class Period in order to artificially support Wachovia's stock price in the midst of a weakening mortgage market. In response to increased market concern with the mortgage lending industry, and Wachovia's option ARMs in particular, Wachovia falsely represented that its loan underwriting practices were much better than at other banks and that this would allow it to prosper while lenders with less exacting standards and procedures would fare much worse. In reality, Wachovia's actual lending practices differed materially from the description of those practices in statements made to investors. The Company's ability to weather the deterioration in the real estate and credit markets was grossly exaggerated by Defendants, at precisely the worst time, when analysts began to ask tough questions. The Company, moreover, had inadequate loan loss reserves and falsely represented that its capital position was sufficient to fund its dividend. Shortly after last assuring the market of its liquidity, the strength of its underwriting practices, and the adequacy of its reserves, Wachovia reported a surprise quarterly loss, undertook emergency measures to increase capital, and cut its dividend. On April 14, 2008, before the open of ordinary trading, Wachovia reported a loss of $350 million, or $0.20 per share, for the first quarter of 2008. The Company attributed the results to: (1) a $2.8 billion increase credit loss reserves, including $1.1 billion specifically for "Pick-A-Pay" reserve build, the lending program highly touted by the Company during the Class Period. The need to increase Pick-A-Pay reserves was attributed to Wachovia's adoption of a "refined reserve modeling" that resulted in "higher than expected loss factors on Pick-a-Pay"; and (2) $2 billion in mark-to-market losses for mortgage backed securities, including a "$729 million loss on unfunded leveraged finance commitments." In order to shore-up its capital, Wachovia announced the following steps: (1) reduce the dividend 41% to $0.375; and (2) plan to raise capital by $7-8 billion through public offerings. In reaction to the news, shares fell from $27.81 to $25.55 (8.13%) on abnormally high volume.

This marks the third separate action filed against Wachovia in 2008. The other two cases are related to Auction Rate Securities and stock offerings.


If you bought Wachovia Corporation securities and would like to obtain information about the Wachovia Corporation lawsuit, then you are invited to call Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC toll free at (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney or visit www.kgscounsel.com.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Sipex Corporation (NasdaqNM:SIPX), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 11, 2003 and January 20, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against PHH Corporation (PHH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 12, 2005 and March 1, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Lowrance Electronics, Inc. announced that Lowrance and the members of its board of directors have entered into an agreement to settle the stockholder class action lawsuit brought against Lowrance and the members of its board in opposition of the offer and merger transaction with Simrad Yachting AS and Simrad Yachting's wholly owned subsidiary, Navico Acquisition Corporation.
 
The judge entered an order consolidating the cases, approving the SUL Group as lead plaintiff and their selection of Klafter & Olsen LLP and Berger & Montague PC as lead counsel.
 
Two class actions has been filed against Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. (NYSE: OPY), it’s subsidiaries, and certain of its individual funds, officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between August 31, 1999 and March 22, 2004. In this case, the plaintiffs seek damages under common law theories for fraud and deceptive practices. A related case claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. In both cases the stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock together with punitive damages and costs.
 
Several class actions have been filed against prosthetics company Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc., (NYSE: HGR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 29, 2003, and June 14, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.