Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC

Report Fraud
Case ID: 5107 | Stocks | 07/21/2008

According to a law firm press release, a class action has been commenced on behalf of all persons or entities who have tendered or are being asked to tender their shares of Falcon Strategies Two LLC, a fund affiliated with defendant Citigroup, Inc. (“Citigroup”) (NYSE:C), in connection with a tender and exchange offer (the “Tender Offer”), on the basis of a Confidential Tender and Exchange Offer Memorandum, dated May 8, 2008 (the “Tender Memorandum”), that contains materially misleading statements and omissions. The Complaint alleges claims under Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Delaware law.

Defendant Falcon is a Delaware limited liability company that was purportedly formed on April 27, 2004 to serve as a multi-strategy fixed income alternative seeking to provide investors with absolute returns, current income and portfolio diversification. The Company, which commenced operations on October 29, 2004, claimed to invest in a select combination of fixed income strategies to achieve attractive risk-adjusted, and in some cases “absolute,” returns.

The Complaint alleges that, unbeknownst to investors, Falcon’s investment approach was not conservative but was instead highly leveraged on the condition of the credit markets and liquidity in the bond markets. In this regard, Falcon’s investments were more akin to derivatives. According to the Complaint, in fact, Falcon employed municipal bond arbitrage, carried commercial debt obligations and held asset-backed mortgage instruments that were intrinsically tied to the condition of the credit and bond markets. Moreover, Falcon heavily invested in funds under the Citigroup umbrella that employed these investment strategies. When these markets failed, the underlying investments declined in value.

In connection with the filing of the Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the Tender Offer until Falcon and other named defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) correct the allegedly false and misleading Tender Memorandum to enable investors to make an informed decision about whether to tender their shares. In particular, Plaintiff alleges that the Tender Memorandum is materially false and misleading because it fails to disclose the following material facts: the present and potential value of the Company’s assets and shares, as well as the makeup of those assets and the Company’s individual investments; the nature of any claims that Defendants are requiring investors to release as a condition to the acceptance of any tendered shares; the nature, scope and subject matter of the U.S. regulatory inquiry to which Citigroup is responding as well as any related civil litigation; and the events leading up to the investors’ massive losses, the Tender Offer and the wind-up and liquidation of the Company’s assets and operations. The Court has not yet set a date for Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion and there can be no assurance that the Court will set a date for the injunction hearing. If the Tender Offer is not enjoined by the Court (or voluntarily extended by Defendants), it will expire according to its terms on June 30, 2008.


If you bought Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC securities and would like to obtain information about the Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC lawsuit, then you are invited to call Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC toll free at (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney or visit www.kgscounsel.com.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against petrochemical giant Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased, owned, or otherwise acquired Mobil shares and whose Mobil shares were exchanged for Exxon Mobil common stock as a result of the merger transaction approved by shareholders on May 27, 1999. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading financial statements contained in a proxy filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, overstating the Exxon's financial condition by inflating revenue and failing to account for impaired assets in violation of General Accepted Accounting Principles. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against accounting firm Ent & Imler Group, P.C. (ENTCPA) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased investment notes offered by the firm on behalf of the Church Extension of the Chruch of God between April 30, 1998 and April 30, 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $1.25 million settlement in a class action filed against MiniMed, Inc., and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who held the company's common stock as of July 16, 2001. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement must submit a proof of claim form postmarked no later than September 13, 2004.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $15.25 million settlement in a class action filed against sportswear company Ashworth, Inc., (Nasdaq:ASHW) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 4, 1997, and July 15, 1998. A claims deadline had apparently not yet been set as of July 9, 2004. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys for the class for more information.
 
A class action has been filed against Pixar (PIXR), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 18, 2005 and June 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Pacific Life Insurance Company by persons in the United States who, through their ownership of a Pacific Life annuity or insurance product, held units of any Pacific Life sub-account invested in mutual funds which included foreign securities. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by utilizing market timing strategies to increase company profits to the detriment of annuity holders.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.