|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 5101 | Stocks | 07/21/2008
According to a press release dated May 6, 2008, the lawsuit charges Cbeyond and its founder, Chairman, President and CEO, with violating Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and certain rules thereunder. The case alleges that beginning on November 1, 2007, the defendants made specific misstatements designed to hide the fact that Cbeyond was recording a higher churn rate for its services, which permitted certain of Cbeyond's officers and directors to engage in insider sales of $39 million of Cbeyond stock at artificially inflated prices. Shortly thereafter, Cbeyond was forced to admit on February 21, 2007 that it elected to make certain operational changes that caused its churn rate to climb even higher, contrary to its prior representations. Cbeyond's stock price dropped 20% on this shocking news.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Stocks Cases of Interest According to a press release dated April 30, 2008, the complaint charges Arbitron and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides media and marketing information services in the United States and internationally. The Company's Portable People Meter ratings service is purportedly capable of measuring radio, broadcast television, cable television, Internet broadcasts, satellite radio and television audiences, and retail store video and audio broadcasts.
On March 28, 2008, a motion to consolidate cases, to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels was filed. Just as quickly, on April 14, 2008, a response to the previously mentioned motion was filed by WCI Communities, Inc. At the same time, a motion to reset trial was filed on April 11, 2008. The court granted its motion to reset trial on April 14, 2008. However, the court denied the motion to consolidate cases, to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels and entered its order on May 28, 2008.
A class action has been filed against KLA-Tencor Corporation (KLAC), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 13, 2003 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Viisage Technology, Inc. (NasdaqNM:VISG), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 25, 2004 and March 02, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Pixar (PIXR), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 18, 2005 and June 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against St. Jude Medical, Inc. (STJ), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 25, 2006 and April 4, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. |
|
Class Action Lawsuit Center ||
Product Recall Center ||
Consumer Complaint Center ||
About LawCash
Link Exchange
Privacy Policy ||
Legal Policies ||
Terms & Conditions ||
Website Advertising Policy ||
Site Map ||
Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
