|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 5092 | Stocks | 07/18/2008
According to a press release dated April 14, 2008, the Complaint alleges that Wells Fargo violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by deceiving investors about the investment characteristics of auction rate securities and the auction market in which these securities traded. Auction rate securities are either municipal or corporate debt securities or preferred stocks which pay interest at rates set at periodic “auctions.” Auction rate securities generally have long-term maturities or no maturity dates.
The Complaint alleges that, pursuant to uniform sales materials and top-down management directives, Wells Fargo offered and sold auction rate securities to the public as highly liquid cash-management vehicles and as suitable alternatives to money market mutual funds. According to the Complaint, holders of auction rate securities sold by Wells Fargo and others have been unable to liquidate their positions in these securities following the decision on February 13, 2008 of all major broker-dealers including Wells Fargo to “withdraw their support” for the periodic auctions at which the interest rates paid on auction rates securities are set. The Complaint alleges that Wells Fargo failed to disclose the following material facts about the auction rate securities it sold to the class: (1) the auction rate securities were not cash alternatives, like money market funds, but were instead, complex, long-term financial instruments with 30 year maturity dates, or longer; (2) the auction rate securities were only liquid at the time of sale because broker-dealers were artificially supporting and manipulating the auction rate market to maintain the appearance of liquidity and stability; and (3) broker-dealers routinely intervened in auctions for their own benefit, to set rates and prevent all-hold auctions and failed auctions.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Stocks Cases of Interest A class action has been filed against Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: DURA) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 15, 1997, and February 24, 1998. A class action has been filed against direct-to-consumer specialty medical products provider PolyMedica Corporation (Nasdaq: PLMD) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 23, 2001, and June 30, 2003.
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of persons who acquired the common stock of EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("EPIX" or "Company"), between July 10, 2003 and January 14, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action has been filed in the Southern District Court of New York against the Open Joint Stock Company (NYSE: VIP) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 24, 2004 and December 8, 2004. The Company, also known as Vimpel Communications or Vympel Communicatii, operates under the 'Bee Line GSM' brand in Russia and 'K-mobile' and 'EXCESS' brands in Kazakhstan. VimpelCom is recognized for introducing two digital cellular communications standards in Russia.
The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Immucor, Inc. (BLUD), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 7, 2005 and August 29, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. On July 23, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' $2 million settlement of several class actions filed against financial services company Towne Services, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: TWNE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 23 and October 13, 1999. To recover under the settlement, a completed proof of claim postmarked no later than September 15, 2003, must be mailed to the claims administrator. |
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
