Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation

Report Fraud
Case ID: 5074 | Stocks | 07/17/2008

According to the docket, the case was removed from the State Court to the Federal District Court system on April 25, 2008 after being filed on March 26, 2008.

The complaint alleges that J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation 1 issued false and misleading Registration Statements and Prospectus Supplements during the class period. JP Morgan Acceptance and the Defendant Issuers caused Registration Statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the issuance of billions of dollars of Certificates. The Certificates were issued pursuant to Prospectus Supplements, each of which was incorporated into the Registration Statements. The Certificates included several classes or trenches, which had various priorities of payment, exposure to default, interest payment provisions and/or levels of seniority. These Certificates were supported by large pools of mortgage loans. The Registration Statements represented that the mortgage pools would primarily consist of loan groups generally secured by first liens on residential properties, including conventional, adjustable rate and negative amortization mortgage loans.

The complaint continues its allegations, stating that investors purchased the Certificates based upon two primary factors: return (in the form of interest payments), including timing of principal and interest payments, and safety (risk of default of the underlying mortgage loan assets). The Registration Statements discussed the underwriting standards purportedly used in connection with the underwriting of the underlying mortgage loans and included numerous representations about the loan-to-value ratios used to qualify borrowers, the appraisals of properties underlying the mortgages and the maximum debt-to-income ratios permitted on the mortgage loans.

Also alleged by the plaintiffs, the Registration Statements omitted and/or misrepresented the fact that the sellers of the underlying mortgages to JP Morgan Acceptance were issuing many of the mortgage loans to borrowers who: (i) did not meet the prudent or maximum debt-to-income ratio purportedly required by the lender; (ii) did not provide adequate documentation to support the income and assets required for the lenders to approve and fund the mortgage loans pursuant to the lenders' own guidelines; (iii) were steered to stated income, asset and low documentation mortgage loans by lenders, lenders' correspondents or lenders' agents, such as mortgage brokers, because the borrowers could not qualify for mortgage loans that required full documentation; and (iv) did not have the income required by the lenders' own guidelines to afford the required mortgage payments which resulted in a mismatch between the amount loaned to the borrower and the capacity of the borrower. The Registration Statements failed to disclose that the lenders or the lenders' agents knew that the borrowers either could not provide the required documentation or refused to provide it.

Finally, the complaint alleges that the Registration Statements did not disclose that the underwriting, quality control and due diligence practices utilized in connection with the approval and funding of the mortgage loans were so weak that some borrowers were given mortgage loans based on stated income in the loan applications with purported income amounts that could not possibly be reconciled with the jobs claimed on the loan application or through a check of free "online" salary databases.

As a result of these alleged misstatements and omissions, the Certificates sold to plaintiffs and the Class were secured by assets that had a much greater risk profile in the form of a statistically significant difference between the expected versus actual performance of such assets than represented in the Registration Statements, and defendants offered superior credit ratings on the Certificates as a result of defendants' failure to disclose the underwriting defects and appraisal manipulations.


If you bought J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation securities and would like to obtain information about the J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation lawsuit, then you are invited to call Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC toll free at (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney or visit www.kgscounsel.com.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against software provider Nassda Corporation (Nasdaq:NSDA) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 13, 2001, and June 11, 2004, including those who acquired their shares pursuant to its initial public offering. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period defendants issued public statements which they knew or recklessly disregarded were materially false and misleading I and failed to fully disclose material adverse facts concerning Fremont General's business, operations and prospects.
 
A class action has been filed against Pixar (PIXR), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 18, 2005 and June 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
On May 13, 2008, a motion to appoint Ropeta Group as lead plaintiff and to approve the selection of lead counsel was filed. Just as quickly, a stipulation and order was entered and signed by Judge Julian Abele Cook on May 19, 2008.
 
The parties have reached a tentative settlement that may range from at least $1 billion to over $5 billion in a consolidated class action filed against more than 300 initial public offering issuers and their underwriters on behalf of persons who purchased stock pursuant to the initial public offerings of the companies beginning in 1998 and continuing through December 6, 2000. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact attorneys for the class.
 
The market timing scandal has blighted the market for months now. Several class actions have been filed against investment company Capital Management Investors Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiary, Security Trust Company, and certain of officers and directors by stockholders who purchased shares or other ownership units of Janus Worldwide Fund (Nasdaq:JAWWX), American Funds EuroPacific Fund (Nasdaq:AEPGX), MFS Emerging Growth Fund (Nasdaq:MFEGX), Legg Mason Value Trust Fund (Nasdaq:LMVTX), Artisan International Fund (Nasdaq:ARTIX), AXP International Y Fund (Nasdaq:IDIYX), SEI International Equity A Fund (Nasdaq:SEITX), SEI Emerging Markets I Fund (Nasdaq:SIEMX) or other mutual funds between May 22, 2000 and July 3, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by utilizing an illegal after-hours market-timing scheme to make personal profits at the expense of personal investors.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.