Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Charys Holding Company

Report Fraud
Case ID: 5044 | Stocks | 07/17/2008

On April 21, 2008, a motion to appoint J & J Productions Pension Plan and certain individuals as lead plaintiffs and lead counsels was filed.

According to a press release dated February 20, 2008, the complaint charges that Charys' officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Charys operates two segments: Remediation and Reconstruction and Wireless Communications and Data Infrastructure. Charys' Remediation segment provides services to respond to catastrophic losses, like hurricanes; its Wireless segment offers telecommunication services to large service providers. According to the complaint, defendants engaged in an elaborate accounting fraud in connection with several companies Charys acquired.

In the closing months of 2005, Charys acquired Viasys Network Services, Inc. and Viasys Services, Inc. ("Viasys"), as well as Method IQ, Inc. ("MIQ"). The sellers of Viasys and MIQ were to receive "earn out" payments if, after the acquisitions, Charys achieved certain goals for revenue and earnings. The complaint alleges that the pre-acquisition revenues of Viasys and MIQ should have been properly recorded on the books of those companies. Instead, they were improperly deferred and recorded on the books of Charys after it acquired those companies. In addition, the post-acquisition expenses of Viasys and MIQ should have been recorded on the books of Charys, but were instead improperly accrued and recorded on the books of Viasys and MIQ. As a result, Charys' revenue and gross profit were overstated during the Class Period, and it expenses were understated.

On June 8, 2006, Charys acquired Crochet & Borel Services, Inc. ("C&B"), using artificially inflated stock as currency. Defendants engaged in the same accounting scheme: the reported C&B revenue and income from operations were materially overstated because Charys had fraudulently included pre-acquisition C&B revenues and had omitted C&B post-acquisition expenses. In addition, during the Class Period, defendants knew or recklessly ignored that C&B's goodwill was materially impaired by well over $100 million, but failed to disclose this fact. Charys, however, continued to request extensions of time from the SEC in which to file its annual report on Form 10-KSB.

On August 14, 2007, the end of the Class Period, when no large catastrophic-loss contracts for C&B were announced, the investment community knew that a large write-down of C&B's goodwill was imminent. The stock price dropped, and continued to decline thereafter. On November 5, 2007, Charys announced a $202.5 million write-down of goodwill attributable to C&B. Charys also finally filed its fiscal 2007 Form 10-KSB on that date, confirming that C&B had been an unprofitable business whose goodwill should have been written down as of October 31, 2006. On February 14, 2008, Charys filed for bankruptcy and announced that individual defendant, the Company's CEO, had resigned.


If you bought Charys Holding Company securities and would like to obtain information about the Charys Holding Company lawsuit, then you are invited to call Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC toll free at (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney or visit www.kgscounsel.com.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against certain of the officers and directors of electronics services provider DDi Corporation (OTCBB: DDICQ, formerly OTCBB: DDIC and Nasdaq: DDIC) by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 19, 2000, and April 29, 2002.
 
Several class actions have been filed against amorphous alloy manufacturer Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq:LQMTE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 21, 2002, and March 30, 2004, including those who acquired shares pursuant to the company’s May 21, 2002, initial public offering. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against CSK Auto Corporation (CAO), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 2, 2004 and March 24, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The complaint charges MF Global and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. MF Global is a broker of exchange-listed futures and options.
 
A class action has been filed against CONSOL Energy Inc. (NYSE: CNX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 24 and July 18, 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Several class actions have been filed against software company BEA Systems, Inc., (Nasdaq:BEAS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 13, 2003, and May 13, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.