Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Pennsylvania Class Action Challenges Payday Lender

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4986 | Credit / Debt | 04/19/2007

A Philadelphia woman has filed a multi-million dollar class action lawsuit against a Utah-based lender that makes payday loans through numerous Internet sites.

According to the suit, Direct Financial Solution of Utah has unlawfully charged Pennsylvania consumers interest rates in excess of 2000% APR and has violated the usury laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The suit seeks to recover millions of dollars in illegal interest and to halt the allegedly unlawful loans.

Payday loans are short-term loans made to individuals who have poor credit and which require a deduction from the worker's paycheck for repayment. The Center for Responsible Lending estimates the industry costs Americans $4.2 billion a year by charging exorbitant fees.

These companies victimize those who live paycheck to paycheck and "they should be downright ashamed of themselves for putting working class families into desperate financial situations," said one of the attorneys representing plaintiffs.

The suit seeks to enjoin the lender from preying on the Pennsylvania working class and to recover millions of dollars in damages on behalf of all consumers who have been forced to pay excessive interest rates to what the handling attorney calls "cyber loan sharks" and "blood suckers."

The owners of Direct Financial Solution have been sued in many states and have agreed to repay millions to the thousands of customers who have paid interest on those loans.

Lenders Fight Back

With the federal government sitting out the battle, states have been trying to shut down or at least curtail payday lending, but the industry has been fighting back, flooding state legislatures with lobbyists.

The industry says it provides a service to low-income consumers with poor or no credit. Banks will not lend them money, industry backers say, so "cash advance" stores or payday lenders fill a critical need.

Critics counter that rather than providing a service, the payday lending industry is exploiting low-income consumers, trapping them in a spiral of debt. If a consumer borrows $100, a payday lender typically collects a fee of 15 percent, in this case $15.

That might not sound like much, but for a two-week loan, it amounts to an annual interest rate of 390 percent -- and is typically about what street-level mobsters charged for loans in the early 20th century before organized crime was "eliminated" and usurious lending was legalized.

The lawsuit seeks to represent individuals who used Payday Lender and paid exorbitant interest rates.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Kennecott Holdings Corporation for denying medical insurance benefits and claim denial review against the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The class seeks costs, interests and attorneys’ fees.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against Reliance Trust Company. The case involves allegations of fraud. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action has been filed against Community Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Utah (CCCS) by the Utah Division of Consumer Protection, on behalf of consumers who have taken part in CCCS’ debt management services. The lawsuit alleges that CCCS violated the Utah Credit Services Organization Act and the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act.
 
A statewide class action has been filed in Pennsylvania against collection specialists Debt Enforcement Bureau, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Pennsylvania consumers who, since May 12, 2003, received form type collection letters from Debt Enforcement that contained language regarding potential lawsuits as well as mentioning the Sheriff's Department. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A national class action has been filed in Washington against wireless provider giant, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. customers of AT&T Wireless who were charged alleged unauthorized billing penalties as a result of terminating their AT&T Wireless contract. The action is brought under federal law communications law and state contract law and seeks restitution, compensatory and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
Yahoo Agrees to Settle with Checkmate.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.