Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Michigan Homeowners File Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Defective Carrier Corporation and Bryant Condensing Furnaces

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4963 | Consumer Products | 12/28/2006

Class counsel announced that homeowners in Michigan today filed a class action lawsuit against Carrier Corporation, the manufacturer of Carrier and Bryant condensing furnaces (also marketed under the brand names “Day & Night” and “Payne”).

The homeowners allege that beginning in the mid-1980s, Carrier started manufacturing its high-end furnaces out of inferior material that corrodes and prematurely fails, without disclosing that fact to consumers. The case was filed on behalf of an estimated 250,000 residents of Michigan that own Carrier and Bryant furnaces.

Michigan homeowners often run their furnaces for at least five months of the year,” stated counsel for plaintiffs. “It is of great concern that Carrier would sell a furnace that could potentially malfunction in the dead of winter well before the end of their warranted life" said the lawyer for the homeowners.

This lawsuit marks the fourth class action lawsuit filed against Carrier Corporation for failing to disclose defects in its furnaces. In 2005, homeowners in the State of Washington filed suit. Two months ago, homeowners in Wisconsin and Ontario also filed class action complaints.

The complaints in each case allege that in the mid-1980s Carrier stopped using stainless steel secondary heat exchangers in favor of cheaper polypropylene-laminated mild steel. Carrier switched to the cheaper product despite the fact that the industry standard was (and still is) to use stainless steel parts to prevent corrosion. Plaintiffs allege that the polypropylene separates from the steel and degrades due to the high temperatures in the furnace, exposing the underlying mild steel to acidic condensate. In some cases the corrosion proceeds to the point of actually perforating the outside wall of the heat exchanger.

In the United States, Carrier warrants the heat exchanger for the lifetime of the original purchaser and for 20 years for subsequent purchasers. Despite the warranty, plaintiffs allege that Carrier’s condensing furnaces fail prematurely and well before their warranted and expected life.

The lawsuit seeks to represent Michigan Homeowners that own a defective Carrier furnace.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

Lawyers filed a a class action lawsuit against the operators of an alleged pyramid scheme in Louisville, Kentucky. The Phoenix Group and Eli Ohayon are named as defendants.
 
Several class actions have been filed against newspaper publisher Hollinger International, Inc. (NYSE: HLR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 13, 1999, and March 31, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
An administrative proceeding has been filed by the Federal Trade Commission against Boston-area marketers Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc., ITV Direct, Inc., along with business partners Healthy Solutions, LLC, and Health Solutions, Inc., Triad ML Marketing, Inc., and King Media, Inc., on behalf of all persons who purchased the dietary supplements “Supreme Greens with MSM” and “Coral Calcium Daily.” The action alleges that the companies falsely promoted the supplements as a means to treat, cure, and prevent cancer and other diseases, and to cause significant weight loss, in violation of the federal FTC Act.
 
Several class actions have been filed against tool manufacturer Spear & Jackson, Inc. (OTC:SJCK.OB) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 14, 2003, and April 15, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Missouri against Bank of America for violations of banking law. Class members seek damages, injunctive relief, attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
A lawsuit against De Beers Diamond company was filed on February 17, 2005 by Illinois attorneys on behalf of Emert and Katie Null of Madison County, Illinois. The plaintiffs claim that De Beers is a century old cartel, dominating the international rough diamond, controlling as much as 80 percent of the world diamond supply. Currently, the suit alleges, De Beers controls 50 percent of the world’s diamond supply, and an even greater percentage of the supply of two-carat and larger rough diamonds.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.