Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

KGS Announces First Filing of Shareholders Securities Fraud Class Action Against Xethanol Corporation

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4939 | Stocks | 10/24/2006

NEW ORLEANS, LA--(MARKET WIRE)—October 24, 2006 -- Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") has filed the first class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of shareholders who purchased, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of Xethanol Corp. ("Xethanol” or the "Company'') (AMEX: XNL) between January 31, 2006 and August 8, 2006 (the “Class Period”).

Xethanol and certain of its officers and directors are charged with issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements in violation of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Throughout the Class Period, Xethanol repeatedly assured investors that it could sustain itself on revenue from corn ethanol production while successfully commercializing biomass ethanol production. In fact, however, as investor have now learned, Xethanol was suffering from a host of undisclosed adverse factors that negatively impacted its business and it appears that they do not have the ability to commercialize biomass ethanol in the foreseeable near term. As investors learned the truth about Xethanol, shares of the Company declined precipitously – falling from a Class Period high of over $15 per share in April 2006, to less than $4.00 per share by the end of the Class Period. While shares of Xethanol were artificially inflated during the Class Period, certain insiders where able to liquidate millions of dollars of their personally held Xethanol shares.

Particularly, the complaint alleges that Xethanol: (1) misrepresented management’s experience and standard of ethics; (2) omitted disclosing a series of related party transactions and association with investors who had alarming records of stock fraud and related shareholder abuses; (3) materially overstated the Company’s profitability by under-reporting the true costs associated with completing a biomass to ethanol production facility, and by failing to make proper adjustments to the Company’s financial reports; (4) lacked any reasonable basis to assert that the Company was operating according to plan or could achieve the near-term commercialization of biomass ethanol production, or achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by the Company; and (5) caused plaintiffs and other Class members to purchase Xethanol common stock at artificially inflated prices.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. If you would like to discuss your legal rights, you may e-mail or call KGS, without obligation or cost to you. You may contact Managing Partner Lewis Kahn of KGS direct, toll free 1-866-467-1400, ext., 100, or 504-648-1850, or by email at lewis.kahn@kglg.com.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Citadel Security Software Inc. (NASDAQ: CDSS), a TX based provider of technology for security systems, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between February 12 2004 and December 16, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $2.3 million settlement of a class action filed against dietary supplements maker PharmaPrint, Inc. (Pink Sheets: PPRT, formerly OTCBB: PPRT) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 1 and November 15, 1999.
 
A class action has been filed against KLA-Tencor Corporation (KLAC), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 13, 2003 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Rambus, Inc. (RMBS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 12, 2001 and June 27, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against for-profit education provider Corinthian Colleges, Inc., (Nasdaq:COCO) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 27, 2003, and June 23, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed in the District Court of Maryland against RS Diversified Growth Fund, et al and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between October 6, 1999 and October 5, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.