Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Brooks Automation, Inc. |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been filed against Brooks Automation, Inc. (BRKS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 25, 2001 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
According to a press release dated June 20, 2006, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants Brooks Automation, Inc. and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by publicly issuing a series of false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business and financial results, thus causing Brooks's shares to trade at artificially inflated prices. In particular, the Complaint alleges that on March 18, 2006, The Wall Street Journal published a story titled "The Perfect Payday - Some CEOs reap millions by landing stock options when they are most valuable; Luck - or something else?" that identified Brooks as one of several companies "with wildly improbable option-grant patterns." On April 26, 2006, Brooks disclosed that its Board of Directors created a special committee to conduct an internal review of matters related to past stock option grants, including the timing of such grants and associated documentation. The Complaint further alleges that on May 11, 2006, Brooks issued a press release titled "Brooks Automation to Restate Past Periods Related to Certain Stock Option Grants," that stated, in part, that "the Company will be required to correct certain SEC filings, including particularly its financial statements contained in filings for some or all of the periods commencing in fiscal 1999 and ending in fiscal 2005." Brooks further stated that "[t]he Company believes that it accounted for certain matters concerning stock options incorrectly, and as a result recognized less compensation expense than it should have in periods prior to fiscal 2006." On May 18, 2006, two individuals reportedly resigned from the Company's Board of Directors. The Complaint also alleges that the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an informal inquiry concerning stock option grant practices to determine whether violations of the federal securities laws have occurred and Brooks has allegedly received a grand jury document subpoena from the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York requesting records pertaining to the granting of stock options. The Complaint further alleges that during the Class Period, certain Company insiders sold approximately 320,000 Brooks shares at artificially inflates prices for proceeds of approximately $6.4 million. The complaint alleges that, as a result of the Company's recent disclosures, that since March 20, 2006, the first trading day after the above-noted Wall Street Journal article of March 18, 2006, shares of Brooks have declined from $13.88 per share at the opening of trading on March 20, 2006, to close at $12 per share at the close of trading on May 23, 2006, a decline of $1.88 per share, or approximately 14%.
If you bought Brooks Automation, Inc. securities between July 25, 2001 and May 22, 2006, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the Brooks Automation, Inc. lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
The parties have submitted to an arbitration agreement valued at approximately $7,184,561 in a class action filed against Columbian bank Bancolumbia SA (NYSE: CIB) (formerly known as the Banco de Colombia) and certain of its officers and directors by minority stockholders who purchased the company's common stock. The action claims that the defendants harmed the minority stockholders by violating federal securities laws. Minority stockholders should contact the class attorneys for information on how to participate in the action. A class action has been filed against Ace Limited, a PA based holding company that provides insurance and reinsurance products (NYSE:ACE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 28, 2003 and October 13, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a San Diego, CA based biopharmaceutical company (NASDAQ: LGND) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between July 28, 2003 and August 2, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. Internet security is big business in the aftermath of the 2003 worm attacks. Several class actions have been filed against Internet security solutions provider SonicWALL, Inc. (Nasdaq: SNWL) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 17, 2000, and April 3, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. A class action has been filed against Collins & Aikman Corp. (NYSE:CKC), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 06, 2004 and March 17, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against healthcare services company Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation (formerly NYSE: COL) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 8, 1994, and March 19, 1997. The company is now known simply as HCA Inc. (NYSE: HCA).
|
IT'S FREE
Report
Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your
cell phone or computer to the web.
Share
Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.
Read
Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
|
|