Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Guaranty Shareholders May Recover Millions

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4832 | Stocks | 06/06/2006

A class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of more than 44,000 borrowers in eight states who took part in a second-mortgage program handled by Guaranty National and Commonwealth Bank of Northern Virginia.

The lawsuit alleged the banks and Residential Funding Crop., a former subsidiary of General Motors Acceptance Corp., conspired to mislead borrowers about loan costs, interest rates and the loan's actual value.

If the pending class action suit settles, Guaranty National Bank shareholders may recover more than $11 million.

"A settlement this size does not happen all that often," said a spokesman for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which took over Guaranty National on March 13, 2004, minutes after the bank was closed by the federal office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

OCC officials claim that at the time, Guaranty National was closed for mismanagement and bad banking practices. Specifically, they cited "substantial violations of law and a substantial shrinking of assets and earnings due to unsafe and unsound practices."

The alleged violations "weakened the bank's condition and seriously prejudiced the interests of the bank's depositors and the deposit insurance fund."

Federal officials said the bank "was poorly managed and lacked a permanent president and senior lending officer and appropriate strategic direction at the time of its closing."

David Barr, a spokesman for the FDIC, said the bulk of the money the FDIC has accumulated comes from loans Hancock chose not to assume that either have been sold or are still being paid off by borrowers.

The lawsuit is open to people who borrowed from Guaranty by taking part in a second-mortgage program handled by Guaranty National and Commonwealth Bank of Northern Virginia.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed in the Northern District Court of California against Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: EMBT), a California based global technologies company, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 20, 2004 and October 27, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against food and beverage service company Lancer Corporation (NYSE:LAN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 2000, and February 4, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to a law firm press release, the complaint charges NextWave and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. NextWave is a mobile broadband and multimedia technology company that develops, produces and markets mobile multimedia and wireless broadband products.
 
A class action has been filed against BearingPoint, Inc. (NYSE:BE), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 14, 2003 and April 20, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed in the Southern District Court of New York against Royal Group Technologies, Ltd, (NYSE: RYG) a global manufacturer of polymer-based home improvement, consumer and construction products, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 11, 2004 and October 13, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Refco, Inc. (RFX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 11, 2005 and October 7, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.