|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 4829 | Stocks | 06/05/2006
A class action has been filed against American Tower Corporation (AMT), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 1, 2006 and May 24, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
According to a press release dated May 30, 2006, a securities class action was filed against American Tower Corporation and certain of its officers. This action alleges violations of the federal securities laws in connection with public statements by the Company relating to its stock option practices and related accounting. The Company announced on May 19, 2006 that it was conducting an internal review of its historic stock option granting practices. Further, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in state court in Massachusetts by an individual identifying himself as a shareholder of the Company, purporting to act on behalf of the corporation, against certain current and former officers and directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties with respect to the Company's historic stock option granting practices. If you bought American Tower Corporation securities between February 1, 2006 and May 24, 2006, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the American Tower Corporation lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Stocks Cases of Interest According to a law firm press release, on May 12, 2008 a class action lawsuit on behalf of persons who purchased Auction Rate Securities from RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., Royal Bank of Canada, and RBC Capital Markets Corporation between May 12, 2003 and February 13, 2008 (the “Class Period”), and who continued to hold such securities as of February 13, 2008. The class action is brought against Royal Bank of Canada and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. and RBC Capital Markets Corporation. The Complaint alleges that RBC Dain Rauscher violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by deceiving investors about the investment characteristics of auction rate securities and the auction market in which these securities traded. Auction rate securities are either municipal or corporate debt securities or preferred stocks which pay interest at rates set at periodic “auctions.” Auction rate securities generally have long-term maturities or no maturity dates.
American Express Financial Advisors (AEFA), a division of American Express, was served August 1, 2005 with a motion that asked Federal Court in Arizona to certify a class of more than 500,000 former AEFA clients. The motion was filed by leading plaintiffs attorneys in Arizona. In the Class Certification motion, the former clients allege that AEFA violated fiduciary duties and perpetrated a scheme to defraud its investing clients through the Company's sale of Financial Plans. On March 17, 2008, two motions to appoint certain individuals as lead plaintiffs were filed. While an order denying motion to appoint Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT as lead plaintiff, it granted motion to appoint U.S. Public Pension Fund instead as lead plaintiff on May 09, 2008.
A class action has been filed against Possis Medical, Inc. (NasdaqNM:POSS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 24, 2002 and August 24, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Ionatron, Inc. (IOTN), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 27, 2005 and May 10, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Sipex Corporation (NasdaqNM:SIPX), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 11, 2003 and January 20, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. |
IT'S FREE
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
