Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Lawyers File Class Action Over DuPont Fire Safety Hood

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4825 | Consumer Products | 06/02/2006

Attorneys recently filed a lawsuit seeking class-action status against E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. and one of the company's Canadian subsidiaries in response to a plan to provide prorated refunds to customers who purchased potentially hazardous fire safety devices that were recently recalled.

In April, Vancouver, British Columbia-based Brookdale International Systems Inc., a division of DuPont Canada, announced that it was recalling nearly 300,000 EVAC-U8 and EVAC+ emergency escape smoke hoods after tests showed the products did not work properly, potentially exposing users to carbon monoxide and other airborne toxins.

The single use, personal air filtration systems were marketed as being effective for escaping fires and other smoke emergencies, promising customers 15 minutes of protection from smoke and other toxins. Each unit was sold with either a five- or eight-year shelf-life warranty. In announcing the recall, however, Brookdale offered only to refund the prorated value left on the warranty.

"The shelf-life of a defective product should not be a deciding factor in issuing refunds," said one of the attorneys, who is seeking class-action status for every customer who purchased the devices. "Whether one of these hoods was purchased five days or five years ago doesn't change the fact that using it can leave trusting consumers in a dangerous predicament. Customers should not be penalized because they were lucky enough not to discover first-hand that these products do not work as advertised" said one of the handling attorneys.

In 2002, Brookdale offered full refunds on more than 27,000 hoods purchased by customers who mistakenly believed they would be effective against tear gas or chemical weapons. Four years later, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a "Suspend Use" advisory on March 8, 2006. The EVAC- U8 and EVAC+ hoods were sold on Web sites, by safety products retailers, in catalogs and at travel stores for $75 to $150.

The lawsuit is open to any person that purchased a recalled EVAC- U8 and EVAC+ hoods manfactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

The parties have reached a tentative $375,000 national settlement in a class action filed against video game retailer GameStop Corporation on behalf of persons who purchased a video game from GameStop or affiliated stores between April 12, 1998, and August 1, 2003. Claims must be postmarked on or before November 1, 2003, to be considered valid.
 
The parties have reached a settlement valued at $31.5 million in a class action filed against Microsoft Corporation on behalf of New Mexicans who, between December 1995 and December 2002, indirectly purchased Microsoft operating system, productivity suite, spreadsheet, or word processing software for use in New Mexico. The action alleged that Microsoft violated Mexico’s antitrust laws by illegitimately using its monopoly power. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement may contact attorneys for the class for more information.
 
Consumer protection laws in many states require that manufacturers, distributors, and sellers inform consumers of everything they should know to make an informed purchase. The parties have reached a tentative nationwide $675,000 settlement in a class action filed against Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (formerly known as Venator Group, Inc.) on behalf of holders of Foot Locker gift cards that were sold in paper sleeve holders bearing an expiration date. Based on the legal notice describing this settlement, claims must be submitted via telephone by December 22, 2003, to be considered valid.
 
New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed a $250 million fraud suit against H&R Block Inc., accusing the nation's largest tax preparation service of fraudulently pushing clients to invest their tax refunds in retirement accounts that had high fees and low returns. The lawsuit is on behalf of customers who have opened the Express IRA accounts.
 
Lawyers filed a a class action lawsuit against the operators of an alleged pyramid scheme in Louisville, Kentucky. The Phoenix Group and Eli Ohayon are named as defendants.
 
The Enterprise Mobility Company filed a lawsuit against Harvard Battery, Inc. and Global Technology Systems, Inc. d/b/a Honeywell Batteries for copyright, design patent and utility patent violations. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleges both companies are selling batteries that infringe Symbol's intellectual property.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.