Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Judge OKs Lawsuit Filed by Parolees

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4813 | Civil Rights | 05/24/2006

A federal judge certified a class-action lawsuit filed by prison parolees who claim Illinois Department of Corrections officials violate their rights by not quickly holding parole-revocation hearings when they are charged with new crimes.

District Judge Robert Gettleman in Chicago certified the suit against department officials
on May 8, 2006.

While the lawsuit names seven parolees as plaintiffs, the lawyers for the parolees claim it may extend to about 1,000 parolees.

State prison officials denied violating the rights of the parolees, saying they receive a probable-cause hearing on new charges. Gettleman granted a preliminary injunction to halt the practice. Lawyers have until May 26, 2006 to propose an end to the practice.

The lawsuit is open to parolees in the Ilinois Department of Corrections who believe they were not granted a hearing in a timely fashion.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Civil Rights Cases of Interest

A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against U.S. Pool Acquisition Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since March 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
Retirement plans are often so confusing that it seems like you need to be an accountant to understand them. On July 31, 2003, the trial court ruled in favor of the employees in a class action against IBM Corporation and the IBM Pension Plan on behalf of certain employees who allege that the company's changeover from a traditional retirement plan to a newer cash balance plan has cheated them out of part of their retirement. Benefits will not be available to class members until all possible appeals have been exausted.
 
Kmart agreed to a $13 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit over access for disabled shoppers, a company spokesman said. The agreement, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver, also gives the company 7 1/2 years to bring its stores nationwide into compliance with federal standards for merchandise, counters, restrooms, fitting rooms and parking lots.
 
Alleging violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which bans discrimination against the disabled in "any place of public accommodation," 5 plaintiffs filed a class action suit against Norwegian Cruise Line alleging that the company’s ships fail to comply with American law by providing inaccessible cabins.
 
Federal civil rights laws prohibit employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The parties have reached a settlement apparently valued at $1.5 million in an administrative action filed against the U.S. Department of Agriculture on behalf of Asian and Pacific Islander workers who allege that they were passed over or demoted after they filed discrimination complaints, in violation of their civil rights.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Indiana against auto parts giant, GPC Napa Auto Parts. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana Napa managers and assistant managers who were not paid overtime by the company for hours worked in excess of 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks back pay, liquidated and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must "opt-in" to the action to be considered part of the class. The managers have requested notice be sent to potential claimants.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.