Home Depot Sued Over Carpet Installation Price |
 |
Home Depot faces a class-action complaint in Florida Federal Court accusing it of overcharging customers for carpet installations. The lawsuit claims Home Depot overcharged customers by estimating the amount of old carpet to be removed and installed rather than measuring the exact amount.
Did you hire Home Depot to install carpet in your home, and believe that you may have been overcharged? If so, please click on the above submit button to be contacted by an attorney handling the matter.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest
Two unsatisfied customers recently filed lawsuits against Cingular Wireless on behalf of themselves and others with the same problem. A class action filed against Microsoft Corporation on behalf of end-users of Microsoft operating system products is gathering momentum, having just been affirmed and remanded to the lower court by the New York state Supreme Court. The action alleges that the company committed deceptive acts and practices in the conduct of its business in violation of New York's general business statutes. A national class action has been filed in Illinois against Sprint Communications Company, L.P. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents, who are not Sprint customers, but who have had unauthorized charges added to their phone service by Sprint. The action is brought under the federal Communications Act and federal common law and seeks disgorgement of profits, penalties, compensatory damages and injunctive and declaratory relief. Several class actions have been filed against book wholesaler Advanced Marketing Services, Inc. (NYSE: MKT) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 16, 1999, and January 13, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. On line and in stores, mail-in-rebates have taken hold, and advertisements declaring discounts "after mail-in-rebate" are seen everywhere. A class action has been filed against Sterling National Bank, a New York City based bank that leases and finances telecommunications equipment, for violations of New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. Class members seek declaratory and injunctive relief terminating their obligations to make lease payments on telecommunications equipment to the Bank.
|