Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Northfield Laboratories, Inc. Stockholders Lawsuit Filed |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been filed against Northfield Laboratories, Inc. (NFLD), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 20, 2004 and February 21, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
According to a press release dated March 20, 2006, the Complaint charges defendants, Northfield Laboratories, Inc. and its Chairman and CEO, with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities Act of 1933. Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the class period defendants issued a series of materially false and misleading statements regarding the safety profile and history of PolyHeme, a blood substitute, by failing to disclose the data from the ANH study concerning ten patients who had heart attacks within seven days of taking PolyHeme, that two of those patients died and that none of the patients taking real blood experienced heart attacks. The complaint alleges that on or around February 22, 2006, a story in The Wall Street Journal reported that the data available to defendants from the ANH clinical trial, but not to the public, revealed that ten of 81 patients who received PolyHeme suffered a heart attack within seven days, and two of those died. The data further showed defendants that none of the 71 patients in the ANH clinical trial who received real blood were found to have suffered a heart attack. In the aftermath of receiving this data, defendants shut down the ANH clinical study in 2000 and kept this highly adverse data hidden from the public view. Defendants in a press release on February 22, 2006, responding to The Wall Street Journal article, did not dispute the data concerning the patient heart attacks and deaths from the ANH clinical trial. Rather, defendants admit that they did not publish the data concerning patient heart attacks and deaths, and defendant Gould stated in the press release that "(w)e believe that publishing the full data upon closing the study, would have shown that PolyHeme could not be isolated as the cause of the observed serious adverse events."
The complaint further alleges that the market was stunned by the disclosure of the secret, adverse data from the long-closed ANH clinical trial and the market price of Northfield's common stock fell with the belated disclosures. On February 21, 2006, the day before the disclosure by The Wall Street Journal, Northfield's common stock closed at a price of $12.23 per share. On February 22, 2006, on extraordinary volume of more that 4.1 million shares, Northfield's common stock closed at a price of $11.64 per share. The price continued to drop as the market absorbed all of the news, including the announcement on February 24, 2006, by United States Senator Charles E. Grassley, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, that he has begun an inquiry into the matter.
If you bought Northfield Laboratories, Inc. securities between February 20, 2004 and February 21, 2006, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the Northfield Laboratories, Inc. lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
Lowrance Electronics, Inc. announced that Lowrance and the members of its board of directors have entered into an agreement to settle the stockholder class action lawsuit brought against Lowrance and the members of its board in opposition of the offer and merger transaction with Simrad Yachting AS and Simrad Yachting's wholly owned subsidiary, Navico Acquisition Corporation. A class action has been filed against StarTek, Inc. (NYSE:SRT), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 26, 2003 and May 05, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. New Orleans, LA (Marketwire) – February 1, 2007 - Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") has filed the first class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, on behalf of shareholders who purchased, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. ("Powerwave" or the "Company'') (Nasdaq: PWAV) between May 2, 2005 and October 9, 2006 (the "Class Period"). The securities industry’s transition to e-trading has had some ups and downs, to say the least. The A $4.5 billion class action has been filed against Ameritrade Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq:AMTD) and Knight Trading Group, Inc. (Nasdaq:NITE), and certain key officers and directors of those companies, on behalf of all persons who became customers of Ameritrade between March 29, 1995, and September 30, 2003. The action alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose their true affiliation with one another to Ameritrade customers. Several class actions have been filed against open source operating system company Red Hat, Inc., (Nasdaq:RHAT) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 19, 2003, and July 13, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. A class action has been filed in the Central District Court of California against Hienergy Technologies, Inc., a California based chemical technology company, (HIET.OB), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 22, 2002 and July 8, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
|
|