Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

UW Settles Faculty Pay Lawsuit

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4705 | Employment | 03/17/2006

The University of Washington has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit over faculty salaries. The case claimed that the UW's decision not to grant a general salary increase to its faculty in May 2002 had violated a salary policy adopted two years earlier.
If the tentative settlement is approved by the King County Superior Court, eligible faculty members will receive a two percent salary increase and a share of a negotiated one-time payment of $17.45 million for back pay and interest. The cash payment will also be used to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and other expenses. The amount individual eligible faculty members receive will be based on their total earnings since 2002.

The one time payment will come from the UW's unrestricted fund balance -- money that has accumulated over time from unrestricted investment income and indirect cost revenue. No state appropriated funds or tuition revenue are involved.

The salary policy at the heart of the case was adopted in 2000. It states that the UW will grant "meritorious" faculty members a minimum salary increase of two percent each year. The policy became an issue in 2002, when the state legislature did not provide any funds for a salary increase and the University concluded it could not afford to pay general raises from other sources. Although the faculty salary policy contains a "funding caution" regarding the need for legislative funding, Superior Court Judge Mary Yu ruled last October that University was bound by the policy and was obligated to provide the two percent increase.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. The case involves violations of federal labor law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A federal judge in New Jersey granted class-action status to a lawsuit filed by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) and seven drivers against one of the largest transportation companies in the world. OOIDA, along with seven of its owner-operator members serving as co-plaintiffs, filed suit against Bridge Terminal Transport (BTT).
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of employees of Novastar Mortgage Company. The suit alleges that the company routinely denied overtime pay to loan originators who qualified as hourly employees and who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
Price-fixing by powerful cartels occurs in unlikely-seeming places. The jury has returned a $56 million verdict in an antitrust class action filed against three Maine blueberry processing companies on behalf of Maine wild blueberry growers who directly or indirectly sold wild blueberries to them from February 28, 1996, through February 28, 2000. The money will not be distributed until all possible appeals have been exhausted.
 
Laborers employed by Terminix International Company have filed a class action lawsuit against the nationwide extermination service and its parent company, Servicemaster. The lawsuit claims that the defendants require employees to work hours in excess of 40 per week without receiving overtime. The complaint alleges that this denial of overtime violates the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs seek an award of the unpaid overtime together with interest, costs and other damages.
 
Federal law tries to level the playing field so that Americans who have disabilities can compete. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed an enforcement action against DaimlerChrysler AG on behalf of cognitively-impaired job applicants who allege that the company failed to provide readers for them in violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.