Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Lawsuit Claims Tata America Forced Workers to Hand Over Tax Refunds

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4661 | Employment | 02/17/2006

A class action lawsuit was filed against Tata America, a subsidiary of the Tata Group, claiming the company routinely forced workers to hand over federal and state tax refunds. Gopi Vedachalam, a Tata America employee, filed the lawsuit in the District Court in San Francisco against Tata America International Corporation, its parent Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, as well as Tata Sons, Ltd.

The suit claims that the Tata Company has unjustly enriched itself by requiring all of its non-US-citizen employees to endorse and sign over their federal and state tax refund checks to Tata. The proposed class action suit consists of thousands of current non-US citizen employees of Tata working in the United States, plus former Tata employees dating back to 2000.

"Tata's employees from India and other countries working legally in the United States, including thousands of technical support personnel and project managers, work hard to see that the American corporations they support and Tata are profitable," stated the attorney representing the employees. "These workers are entitled to any amount of taxes they overpaid federal and state tax agencies."

The complaint charges that most Tata employees in the United States are non-US citizens who work on visas. Tata requires each employee to sign an agreement which states that the employee's gross amount of compensation will be includable as earnings in the United States and reported to the US Internal Revenue Service.

The complaint claims that these employees are not paid the amount promised them in these agreements. It further alleges that, at least until July 2005, Tata required its non-US-citizen employees to sign power of attorney agreements delegating an outside agency to calculate and submit each employee's tax return to state and federal authorities. Tata then required its non-US-citizen employees who received tax refunds from state and federal tax authorities to endorse the tax refund checks and send them back to Tata.

Under California Labor Code Section 221, it is unlawful "for any employer to collect or receive from an employee any part of wages theretofore paid by said employer to said employee." The complaint also charges that Tata's conduct violates this Code section as well as the common law forbidding unjust enrichment and conversion

From 2000 to 2003, plaintiff Gopi Vedachalam worked in Hayward, California, as a Tata project manager assigned to Target. Since 2003, he has worked as a Tata project manager for 21st Century Insurance in Woodland Hills, California. "I work hard for Tata and the companies I have been assigned to. I should receive the full wages Tata agreed to pay me, as should all other Tata employees in America. I did not hand over my tax refund checks voluntarily. I tried to recover these wages through Tata's internal procedures, but I was met with either silence or refusal."

Vedachalam wants the US federal court to certify the case as a class action and issue an injunction against Tata, preventing it from requiring its employees to endorse their tax refund checks to the company to the extent it is still doing so. The complaint also seeks compensation and damages for current and former employees who were not paid what they were promised and who were deprived of their tax refunds.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

California's labor laws grant its workers protections not found in many other states. The class has been certified in an action filed against Labor Ready, Inc. on behalf of California employees who allege that the company failed to pay them correctly, wrongly withheld sums from their pay, and failed to rovide them with itemized wage statements in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law and Labor Code between February 14, 1997, and the present. Eligible participants do not need to take any action at this time to remain a member of the class.
 
A class action has been filed against Westar Energy, Inc. by employees alleging that the company violated its fiduciary duty to employees by mismanaging their 401(k) accounts, resulting in massive losses in the value of the accounts.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against the Carlink Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees of Carlink who were not paid proper overtime wages for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District of Florida against Goar Corporation. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in United States District Court against Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. The case was originally filed in San Francisco Superior Court but has been moved to the federal court system at the request of the defendants. The case involves violations of federal labor law. A case management conference before the court has been scheduled for March 5, 2005. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A collective/class action spanning New York, New Jersey and Connecticut has been filed in New York against cable TV giant, Cablevision Systems Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Cablevision customer services representatives who, since June 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week and who, since June 1998, were not paid full wages for all hours worked. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and New York state labor laws and seeks back pay, statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action under federal law, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members. Those who join the case under the state law claims are not required to "opt-in"
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.