Caribou Coffee Faces Lawsuit Filed By Former and Current Employees |
 |
 |
|
|
Current and former Caribou Coffee employees alleges Caribou misclassified its store managers and managers-in-training under the Minnesota and federal Fair Labor Standards Acts to avoid paying them overtime. The class action lawsuit that was filed claims three former Caribou Coffee managers from Minnesota routinely worked 55 hours a week as store managers but spent most of their time performing nonmanagerial duties including waiting on customers, making coffee drinks and cleaning store bathrooms.
The lawsuit, filed in Minnesota State Court accuses Brooklyn Center-based Caribou Coffee of violating wage and overtime laws. Recenlty, a Minneapolis federal judge upheld a magistrate judge's ruling certifying the lawsuit as a class-action case. The rulings, in turn, have enabled plaintiffs' attorneys to notify nearly 700 former and current Caribou store managers about the lawsuit. So far, nearly 100 have decided to join the suit, most of them from Minnesota, said an attorney for the plaintiffs. Prospective class members have until April 10 to join the litigation. A possible trial is scheduled for December 2006.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
Federal civil rights legislation prohibits discrimination based on gender, age, race, and national origin. The parties have reached a $3.5 million voluntary pre-litigation settlement in an enforcement action based on complaints that national hair salon chain Supercuts, Inc. engaged in racial discrimination. The agreement will provide relief to African Americans meeting certain qualifying criteria who applied to, were terminated from, or denied promotions by Supercuts Stores in its Eastern Region between November 1996 and December 2001. Eligible claimants should contact the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for information on how to take part in the sesttlement. A collection action has been filed against the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration and several of its employees on behalf of all employees of the administration who were not paid overtime compensation or minimum wage or were wrongly terminated after complaining to the administration about these payment discrepancies. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and is seeking unpaid wages, statutory damages, and declaratory relief.
We still don't know who sent those two letters filled with anthrax that killed two U.S. Postal workers in Washington, D.C. A $100 million class action has been filed against the U.S. Postmaster General John E. Potter and several other administrative personnel at the U.S. Postal Service processing and distribution center on Brentwood Road in Northeast Washington on behalf of Brentwood postal workers who allege that their Fifth Amendment right to due process of law under the U.S. Constitution was violated when they were exposed to anthrax but not treated in the same efficient manner as victims on Capitol Hill who were exposed when a letter containing the deadly virus was opened in the office of Senator Tom Daschle on October 14, 2001. A class-action lawsuit was filed against Quiznos Sub in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the company has systematically defrauded its franchisees in a scheme designed to build the brand at the expense of its operators in the field. On September 30, 2003, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana certified a class of current and former employees of IPALCO, Inc. in an action against the company seeking compensation for losses to class members' 401(k) retirement funds. Laborers employed by Florida based Land-Ron, Inc. have filed a class action lawsuit claiming that the company routinely requires its employees to work hours in excess of 40 per week without receiving overtime. The complaint alleges that this denial of overtime violates the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs seek an award of the unpaid overtime together with interest, costs and other damages.
|