Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Parents Claim Elementary Schools are Segregated into Indian and White

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4636 | Civil Rights | 02/01/2006

Page Unified School District received notice of a class action lawsuit being filed against it by the Diné Communities for Equality in Education and nine parents who allege that the Page Unified School District's (PUSD) elementary schools are segregated into “Indian” and “white” schools.

The suit, which was filed in a U.S. District Court in Phoenix on January 12, is not requesting any monetary damages suffered from the alleged segregation, but it is asking that the school district implement a plan that eliminates the disproportionate ethnic populations, as well as reimbursement of attorneys’ fees.

In the suit, the plaintiffs claim that Desert View Elementary School and Lake View Elementary School are segregated based on the “racial composition of the student body, faculty and staff.” Based on data from the Arizona Department of Education, the suit claims that the student count at Desert View was 493 students in the 2004-05 school year, 92 percent of which are American Indian. Lake View’s composition for that year was allegedly 53.3 percent American Indian with a student count of 596 students. The suit did not give statistics on the percentage of staff members who are American Indian, although the school district has claimed an average Navajo staff percentage of 14 percent.

The district’s “open enrollment” policy allegedly allows the segregation to occur, according to the plaintiffs. They claim the district uses race to determine student assignments, busing assignments and school enrollment assignments.

The district allegedly “prevents or hinders the enrollment of American Indian students at Lake View or their transfer between the two schools using purported limits on student enrollment regarding school size and capacity, teacher-pupil ratios and class size ratios. These practices do not occur at Desert View,” according to the suit. “Student populations at both schools are less than the facilities’ maximum student capacity.”

The suit claims a review was conducted by the district, but it did not go with the plan of splitting the grades. However, PUSD’s board approved a plan called “Elementary Reconfiguration,” which, in the plaintiffs’ view, did not desegregate the schools but instead provided “tacit admissions of segregation and are now part of the district’s policy, custom and practice of segregating its elementary schools.”

The class action suit notes that the elementary schools, with a combined population of 1,085, are a large part of the district. As a result, “…segregation in the elementary schools renders the entire school district a dual discriminatory educational system that is not unitary in its educational programs and services.”

Besides the DCEE, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Darlene Nelson, William Moore, Belinda Moore, Benny Fowler, Shirley Fowler, Allen Talker, Brenda Talker, Edward Burns, and Elaine Greyeyes; all have children who attend Desert View, according to the court document. The suit names the current members of the PUSD governing board, Dale Tsosie, Jerry Williams, Mark Hansen, Bob LaPlante, and Elizabeth Mayes as defendants.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Civil Rights Cases of Interest

A nationwide class action has been filed in Georgia against publishing giant Primedia, Inc. and its subsidiary Haas Publishing Companies, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all employees who are beyond the age of 40 and have been either terminated from employment, or forced to resign, as a result of age discrimination. The action is brought under the federal Age Discrimination Employment Act and seeks compensatory and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Rollatini's Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since March 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against American Coach Lines of Orlando, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees who have not been paid proper overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. The action is brought under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks back pay, liquidated damages and injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action all potential claimants must voluntarily "opt-in" to the case in order to be considered a member of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
A nationwide class action has been filed in Pennsylvania against mortgage insurance giant, Radian Guaranty. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who have obtained mortgage insurance from Radian at a less than best rate, and have not been informed that an adverse decision was made against them as a result of utilizing a credit report to set their insurance premium. The action is brought under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and seeks actual and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A collective action has been filed in South Carolina against the Berkeley County School District. The action is brought on behalf of all former and current employees who have worked in excess of 40 hours a week, but who have not been paid overtime by the school district. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and is seeking back pay as damages.
 
A national collective action has been filed in Florida against Japanese restaurant giant, Benihana, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since April 2001, were not paid proper statutory minimum wage for all hours worked. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks back pay, statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.