Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Gender Discrimination Class Action Complaint Filed by Female Executives Against Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein And Other Individuals

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4587 | Employment | 01/11/2006

A group of six current female executives filed a class action gender discrimination case in the Southern District of New York against Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein ("DrKW"), a German investment bank, whose parent company is Dresdner Bank AG, a member of the Allianz Group. The six current executives have been with DrKW for a total of 50 years.

According to the 70-page complaint filed January 9, 2005, women at DrKW have confronted a "glass ceiling" which has denied them promotions, compensation on par with male employees, and equality with respect to the terms and conditions of their employment. The complaint sets forth surprising statistical evidence demonstrating the lack of women at senior levels and describes various forms of discriminatory and retaliatory conduct including accounts of exclusion from client meetings that took place at strip clubs, disparaging comments regarding maternity leave, and other sexual innuendo that routinely takes place at work. Women comprise less than two percent of the Managing Directors in the Capital Markets Division of DrKW.

"The glass-ceiling is unfortunately alive and well at Dresdner. I stand united with the five other plaintiffs in seeing this process through to its ultimate conclusion and we all look forward to standing before a New York jury and presenting our case," said a current employee, and one of the Plaintiffs in the class action. "We are confident that we will prevail in this litigation and ultimately show the rest of the financial community that you cannot continue to discriminate against women without paying a price. Hopefully, our new chief executive officerwill take notice of this lawsuit and immediately take steps to rectify the disparity in treatment between men and women" said another plaintiff in the class action.

Filed as a class action, the complaint seeks to represent a wider group of women employees at DrKW. The complaint details the Company's deliberate efforts to channel women into non-revenue producing roles while assigning male colleagues to the plum transactions. For example, as the complaint alleges, after three of the Plaintiffs returned from their respective maternity leaves, they were removed from promising deals and placed into positions that gave them no further room for advancement.

The suit also claims inappropriate behavior by supervisors and other male employees at Dresdner Kleinwort, including inappropriate comments, such as a supervisor describing one plaintiff as "the Pamela Anderson of trading," and others pressuring another female executive to leave a gathering celebrating the closing of a "major deal," so that male employees and client representatives could go to a strip club.

In the complaint, one female executive said salesmen on the fixed-income desk in New York have openly commented about how they chose female junior hires based on appearance and that they wished to have "eye candy" in the office, while another said a male managing director in New York routinely brought prostitutes to the office during the lunch hour.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A national collective action has been filed in Minnesota against financial giant, Bank of America. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Bank of America loan officers who were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks compensatory, statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of Florida against Aspida, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A national collective/class action has been filed in New York against The Eastman Kodak Company. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former technical support specialists or engineers, customer or technical support staff or repair and/or service staff from all Kodak operations, who since May 1998, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act as well as New York and other state labor laws and seeks back pay, statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action under federal law, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members. The state law claims are brought as standard class action claims with no requirement to "opt-in".
 
Marriott Corporation was hit by employee lawsuits on two fronts, accused of violating San Francisco's minimum-wage ordinance and of discriminating against older sales managers who failed to fit the company's purported goal of a younger, hipper image. The wage suit was filed in San Francisco Superior Court by four employees of the downtown Marriott Courtyard as a proposed class action on behalf of affected workers at all seven company-affiliated hotels in the city, including the San Francisco Marriott, the Stanford Court and the Ritz-Carlton.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of employees of insurance carrier Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. The suit alleges that the catastrophic risk insurer routinely denied overtime pay to employees who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
The parties have reached a $4.8+ million settlement in a class action against baking companies Interstate Brands Corporation and Continental Baking Company on behalf of all current and former employees of either company who were employed in route sales positions and were not eligible to receive overtime pay regardless of hours worked, at any time between November 21, 1993, and April 30, 2003. Persons eligible to take part in this settlement should contact the attorneys for the class as soon as possible.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.