Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Sony BMG Faces Another Lawsuit Over First4Internet Software

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4548 | Technology | 01/16/2006

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, (EFF) filed a lawsuit against Sony BMG, demanding that the company repair the damage done by the First4Internet XCP and SunnComm MediaMax software it included on over 24 million music CDs.

EFF is pleased that Sony BMG has taken steps in acknowledging the security risks caused by the XCP CDs, including a recall of the infected discs. However, these measures still fall short of what the company needs to do to fix the problems caused to customers by XCP, and Sony BMG has failed entirely to respond to concerns about MediaMax, which affects over 20 million CDs -- ten times the number of CDs as the XCP software.

The suit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior court, alleges that the XCP and SunnComm technologies have been installed on the computers of millions of unsuspecting music customers when they used their CDs on machines running the Windows operating system. Researchers have shown that the XCP technology was designed to have many of the qualities of a "rootkit." It was written with the intent of concealing its presence and operation from the owner of the computer, and once installed, it degrades the performance of the machine, opens new security vulnerabilities, and installs updates through an Internet connection to Sony BMG's servers. The nature of a rootkit makes it extremely difficult to remove, often leaving reformatting the computer's hard drive as the only solution. When Sony BMG offered a program to uninstall the dangerous XCP software, researchers found that the installer itself opened even more security vulnerabilities in users' machines. Sony BMG has still refused to use its marketing prowess to widely publicize its recall program to reach the over 2 million XCP-infected customers, has failed to compensate users whose computers were affected and has not eliminated the outrageous terms found in its End User Licensing Agreement (EULA).

The MediaMax software installed on over 20 million CDs has different, but similarly troubling problems. It installs files on the users' computers even if they click "no" on the EULA, and it does not include a way to fully uninstall the program. The software transmits data about users to SunnComm through an Internet connection whenever purchasers listen to CDs, allowing the company to track listening habits -- even though the EULA states that the software will not be used to collect personal information and SunnComm's website says "no information is ever collected about you or your computer." If users repeatedly requested an uninstaller for the MediaMax software, they were eventually provided one, but they first had to provide more personally identifying information. Worse, security researchers recently determined that SunnComm's uninstaller creates significant security risks for users, as the XCP uninstaller did.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Technology Cases of Interest

Until now, Microsoft has not gone to trial in a single state antitrust case. A class action has been filed against Microsoft Corporation on behalf of Minnesota residents who purchased Microsoft operating system and application software between 1994 and 2001, who allege that the software giant used its monopoly power to overcharge them for software licenses.
 
The parties have reached a $10 million settlement in an SEC enforcement action filed against Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc., (Nasdaq:GMST) on behalf of stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between 1999 and 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys who prosecuted the action for more information.
 
A class action lawsuit seeking hundreds of millions of dollars from Microsoft is scheduled to go to trial in November 2006. The lawsuit recently made its way to the Iowa Supreme Court for the third time. If the trial is successful, thousands of Iowans who bought computers loaded with Microsoft programs since 1994 could get money back.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick is investigating possible legal actions against email marketers who send unsolicited email in violation of the newly-enacted federal Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN-SPAM Act). The act requires unsolicited commercial e-mail messages to be labeled and to include opt-out instructions and the sender's physical address. It prohibits the use of deceptive subject lines and false headers in such messages. Violators may get stiff civil fines and even get prison sentences as criminals. If you have received email that you think may be prohibited by the act and would like a consultation, please forward all information to Kahn Gauthier, including a copy of the spam email.
 
Several class actions have been filed against technology company Wave Systems Corporation (Nasdaq: WAVX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 31, 2003, and February 2, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
The parties have reached a tentative settlement apparently valued at approximately $611,000 in action filed against Tengasco CEO M.E. Ratliff and Tengasco, Inc. (Amex:TGC) on behalf of stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 1, 2001, and April 22, 2002. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement must file a proof of claim postmarked no later than July 16, 2004.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.