Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
HCA, Inc. Charged With Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been filed against HCA, Inc. (HCA), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 12, 2005 and July 12, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
Several purported shareholder class action lawsuits have been filed against HCA and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. HCA is the nation's largest chain of for-profit hospitals. Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants caused HCA's shares to trade at artificially inflated prices by issuing false statements concerning the Company's purported financial successes while concealing that HCA's operational metrics had substantially deteriorated. Defendants' positive statements had their intended effect, inflating the Company's stock price by almost 50% from less than $40 per share on January 11, 2005 to its Class Period high of over $58 per share on June 22, 2005, during which time defendants sold almost 1 million shares of the Company's stock at inflated prices, pocketing more than $48 million in proceeds.
The complaint alleges that on or around July 13, 2005, HCA issued a profit warning for its 2Q 2005 disclosing that: (a) contrary to defendants' statements that HCA had been experiencing trends beneficial to its "operating results," in reality the Company was then experiencing negative operational trends which were driving down HCA's revenues and decreasing the Company's profitability; (b) despite defendants' statements that the Company was experiencing "a moderation in the growth in its uninsured patient admissions and emergency room visits," the Company's uninsured admissions and emergency room visits were actually increasing more rapidly than insured admissions and emergency room visits, which defendants knew was increasing the Company's bad-debt expense and reducing HCA's profitability; (c) notwithstanding defendants' statements lauding the Company's "favorable change in its estimated provision for doubtful accounts," and "substantial(ly) improv(ing) ... financial performance" due to its "improving bad debt trends," HCA's provision for doubtful accounts was actually increasing as a percentage of revenues; and (d) defendants had materially limited surgeries at certain hospitals due to illegal misconduct. On this news, HCA's stock fell approximately $5 per share on nearly six times the average daily trading volume over the preceding 12 months. Soon thereafter, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice opened formal investigations into Class Period insider trading at HCA.
If you bought HCA, Inc. securities between January 12, 2005 and July 12, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the HCA, Inc. lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
A class action has been filed against Electronic Arts Inc. (EA), (NasdaqNM:ERTS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 25, 2005 and March 21, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A settlement has been reached in a stockholder action filed against TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. with respect to its alleged mishandling of a management buyout. Under the proposed settlement, claimants will share from the proceeds of a 2.5 Million dollar fund. Claimants who wish to participate in the settlement have until February 8, 2005 to file claims. The settlement will not become final until it has been reviewed and approved by the court at a fairness hearing, which has been scheduled for February 8, 2005. A class action has been filed against Janus Capital Group Inc. and certain related firms by investors who purchased shares in any of the Janus Group of mutual funds between October 1, 1998, and July 3, 2003. The action charges that, throughout this time period, the defendants failed to disclose that they improperly allowed certain hedge funds, such as Canary Capital Partners, to engage in "late trading" and "timing" of the funds' securities. Several class actions have been filed against energy holding company Progress Energy, Inc. (NYSE: PGN) and certain of its officers and directors on behalf of investors who obtained Contingent Value Obligations (CVOs) in exchange for their Florida Progress common stock pursuant to the closing of the merger of CP&L Energy and Florida Progress Corporation and who purchased the CVOs between November 30, 2000, and February 12, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to inform prospective CVO holders that the tax benefits represented as being made available to synthetic fuel producers, which were critical to the imputed value of the CVOs, would be adversely affected by the application of the alternative minimum tax. A class action has been filed against Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV (CBI), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 9, 2005 and February 3, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Sierra Wireless, Inc.(NasdaqNM:SWIR), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 28, 2004 and January 26, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
|
IT'S FREE
Report
Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your
cell phone or computer to the web.
Share
Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.
Read
Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
|
|