Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Blockbuster, Inc.

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4532 | Stocks | 11/15/2005

A class action has been filed against Blockbuster, Inc. (BBI), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 8, 2004 and August 9, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

According to a press release dated November 10, 2005, the complaint alleges that Viacom was Blockbuster's controlling shareholder and that, prior to the Exchange Offer, Viacom caused Blockbuster to pay a $5 per share special dividend of which Viacom was the primary beneficiary. In order to pay the dividend, Blockbuster was forced to take on debt in the amount of approximately $1.1 billion.

Subsequently, in the Prospectus issued in connection with Viacom's divestiture of its Blockbuster shares, (the "Prospectus"), defendants stated that Blockbuster planned to transform itself "from a place where you go to rent a movie to a brand where you go to rent, buy or trade a movie or game, new or used, pay-by-the-day, pay-by-the-month, in-store or online." The transformation was to be achieved through a series of initiatives: Blockbuster Online (Internet sales); Movie Pass (in-store movie subscription); Game Pass (in-store game subscription); and "No More Late Fees." Defendants warned investors that the transformation would require heavy investment but assured them that Blockbuster's debt obligations would not stand in the way and that, "the steady operating cash flow from our core rental business has provided us with the ability to invest in new initiatives."

As set forth in the complaint, defendants failed to disclose in the Prospectus and throughout the Class Period that Blockbuster was wholly unprepared to build the technological infrastructure required to integrate its in-store and online sales operations and otherwise execute the Company's transformation. Moreover, the Company's core in-store rental operations were not generating sufficient cash flow to fund Blockbuster's investment in "new initiatives." The truth began to emerge on August 9, 2005, when, before the market opened, the Company reported: (a) a second-quarter net loss of $57.2 million, or $0.31 per share --- well below Company-guided analyst estimates; (b) negative free cash flow of $118 million compared to positive free cash flow of $23 million in the second quarter of 2004; and (c) that it was abandoning its 2005 guidance. The Company also announced that, on August 8, 2005, it had been forced to amend its credit facility to provide for a waiver of its leverage ratio covenants. After this announcement, the Company's stock opened that morning at $7.05, down 11.9%, or $0.96 from the previous day's closing price of $8.01. The stock continued to decline as the market absorbed the full impact of the announcement, falling to a six-year low of $6.30 on August 10, 2005.

The complaint further alleges that after the Class Period, on or around November 8, 2005, defendants stated in an SEC filings that Blockbuster "may not have sufficient cash flows from operating activities, cash on hand and available borrowings under our credit facilities to service our indebtedness" and that the Company could be forced into bankruptcy if it was unable to raise additional funds through a private offering.

The complaint has been filed on behalf of all persons who acquired the publicly traded securities of Blockbuster, Inc. (NYSE:BBI) pursuant to the Company's exchange offer of Viacom, Inc. ("Viacom") stock for 144 million common shares of Blockbuster (the "Exchange Offer"), and on behalf of those who purchased Blockbuster shares in the open market between September 8, 2004 and August 9, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period").

If you bought Blockbuster, Inc. securities between September 8, 2004 and August 9, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the Blockbuster, Inc. lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

According to a press release dated April 10, 2008, the lawsuit claims that First Marblehead and a number of individual defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78j (b) and 78t(a) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5.
 
On April 01, 2008, a notice of non-opposition in regards to the amended motion of the institutional investors group for the appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel was filed by Bankinter Gestion De Activos. Just as quickly, minutes of order explaining about the possible dismissal due to the absence of show cause was entered on May 23, 2008. Hence, the court ordered the plaintiffs to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and a time frame for submitting related materials has been set.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in US District Court against insurance giant Chubb Corporation. The case involves violations of federal securities law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
Several class actions have been filed against deep discount store operator 99 Cents Only Stores (NYSE:NDN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 11, 2004, and June 10, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against China Aviation (Singapore) Corporation Ltd., (CAOLF.PK) a trader of petroleum products, including jet fuel, gas oil, fuel oil, crude oil, plastics and oil derivatives, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 5, 2004 and November 30, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against Russian petroleum producer Yukos Oil Company (OTC BB:YUKOF.PK; OTC BB:YUKOY.PK; Russia:YUKO) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 13, 2003, and October 25, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose that they were using questionable tax schemes to minimize corporate and business taxes owed to the Russian government over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.