Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Lawsuit Filed Against Baltimore-Based Admiral Mortgage Inc.

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4508 | Credit / Debt | 10/31/2005

Baltimore lending company, Admiral Mortgage Inc., faces a class action lawsuit accusing it of charging excessive fees on its secondary mortgage loans and other predatory lending practices.

Plaintiffs in the case are Rodney G. Coster and Teresa L. Coster of Essex, Md., and Amanda Connor and Kevin F. Ashe of Rosedale, Md.

The Costers claim that Admiral charged them an origination fee of $5,936 on a $74,200 second mortgage -- 8 percent of the loan amount. They also allege they were charged more than $1,400 in credit report, processing, document preparation and underwriting fees.

Connor and Ashe said they took out a secondary mortgage loan for $29,000 on Dec. 17, 2004. They claim they paid a $2,340 origination fee, also 8 percent of the principal amount, and then another $1,395 in underwriting, processing and document preparation fees.

Plaintiffs’ attorney representing homeowners said the class of those who were illegally charged by Admiral could include over 500 people and said his firm will file several similar complaints in the upcoming weeks.

According to the plaintiffs' attorney, additional charges imposed on the Costers’ and Connors’ violate Maryland’s Secondary Mortgage Loan Law. That legislation, the complaint states, permits companies like Admiral to charge an origination fee “not to exceed 10 percent of the net proceeds for making a loan.”

Once such a fee is assessed, the law says, a lender cannot collect any other charges. Admiral and other companies get away with overcharging consumers, because many people are not aware of the law.

Furthermore, in both instances cited in the complaint all the charges were “pro-rated over the term of the loan so that every monthly mortgage payment included and continues to include, a portion of the illegal and excessive fees disguised as principal and interest payments, thereby wrongly increasing the monthly payment,” the complaint alleges.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in federal court against Collection Wizzards. The case involves violations of federal fair debt collection practices law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of employees of Novastar Mortgage Company. The suit alleges that the company routinely denied overtime pay to loan originators who qualified as hourly employees and who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
A class action lawsuit was filed against the nation’s largest tax resolution company, JK Harris & Company LLC, for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract including the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The lawsuit seeks to stop JK Harris & Company from continuing unacceptable business practices.
 
A national class action has been filed in Pennsylvania against Action Card and Bankfirst Corporation, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. consumers who either applied for credit or for a credit line increase from the credit card giants and who, after having an adverse action taken against them, were not provided with statutorily required information regarding this decision. Consumers bring this action under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and seek compensatory, statutory and punitive damages as well as an order directing Action Card and Bankfirst to disclose relevant credit information withheld from consumers.
 
A class action has been filed against Fountainhead Title Group Corporation and numerous affiliated businesses and mortgage companies on behalf of all Maryland borrowers who entered into mortgage loan transactions using the services of Fountainhead Title where the HUD-1 Settlement Statement, or other document in the loan file, includes a charge for or payment to an Affiliated Business Arrangement for title or closing services. The action alleges that the affiliated businesses are actually shams that allow the title company and mortgage companies to charge borrowers false fees, in violation of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.
 
Several class actions have been filed against financial services company UICI (NYSE:UCI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 17, 2000, and July 21, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.