Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4477 | Stocks | 10/11/2005

A class action has been filed against Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. (TPX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 22, 2005 and September 19, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

According to a press release dated October 7, 2005, the Complaint alleges that by the beginning of the Class Period investors became concerned that well-heeled competitors, such as Sealy, Serta and Simmons, were making significant inroads into the visco-elastic market that could challenge Tempur-Pedic's dominance or, at the very least, erode its profits if it was forced to slash prices in order to compete. Defendants allayed these concerns by misrepresenting that its business was not suffering from the effects of competition and would continue to grow strongly. Well into the Class Period, defendants reiterated aggressive sales and earnings guidance for 2005, even after the Company had begun to experience a slowdown. Defendants' Class Period representations were materially false and misleading when made because they failed to disclose that: (a) demand for Tempur-Pedic's products was slowing as competitors were gaining a foothold in the visco-elastic market; (b) defendants' repeated express assurances that the competition was not having a materially negative, or any, impact on the Company, even in response to express concerns raised by analysts, were untrue and provided false comfort to investors while inflating the price of Tempur-Pedic stock so insiders could sell their shares; and (c) in light of increasing competition that was already having a noticeable effect on the Company's business, defendants' guidance, reiterated on July 21, 2005, lacked any reasonable basis.

Defendants were motivated to commit the wrongdoing alleged herein in order to sell their personally held Tempur-Pedic stock at artificially inflated prices. During the Class Period, insiders and entities associated with insiders, sold a total of 5,620,591 shares of Tempur-Pedic common stock at artificially inflated prices, for proceeds of $131,910,207. Of that amount, $124,550,000 was sold by TA Associates, a controlling shareholder that has two nominee directors on Tempur-Pedic's board of directors.

The Complaint further alleges that on or around September 19, 2005, Tempur-Pedic issued lower guidance for 2005, which it attributed to a number of factors, including competition that it had said was not and would not have a negative impact, at least not one large enough to cause it to lower its 2005 guidance, which was reiterated less than a month before this announcement.

In response to this announcement, the price of Tempur-Pedic common stock plummeted, falling 28.5% in one day, to $11.70 per share on July 20, 2005 from $16.38 per share on July 19, 2005, on unusually heavy trading volume.

If you bought Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. securities between April 22, 2005 and September 19, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed in the Southern District Court of New York against Jakks Pacific, Inc. (NYSE: JAKK), a California based toy company and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 1999 and October 19, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
On March 17, 2008, two motions to appoint certain individuals as lead plaintiffs were filed. While an order denying motion to appoint Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT as lead plaintiff, it granted motion to appoint U.S. Public Pension Fund instead as lead plaintiff on May 09, 2008.
 
The class has been certified in several consolidated actions filed against Ahsanti Goldfields, Ltd., on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the company’s Global Depository Receipts in transactions on stock exchanges in the US between April 21, 1997, and October 5, 1999. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against Buca, Inc. (NasdaqNM:BUCA), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 06, 2001 and March 11, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Two class action cases have been filed in San Diego Superior Court against strip mall developer Price Legacy Corporation (Nasdaq: PLRE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders. The actions claim that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty to stockholders in a recent merger with PL Retail LLC. Specifically, the stockholders claim that PL Retail did not pay fair value when it acquired Price Legacy and that Price legacy should have held out for a better price.
 
A class action has been filed against crude oil marketer and transporter EOTT Energy Partners, L.P. (OTCBB: EOTTV, formerly NYSE: EOT and Pink Sheets: EOTPQ) and certain of its officers and directors by investors who purchased the company's units between July 2, 2001, and January 22, 2002.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.