Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Cintas Workers Win Historic Class Action Suit

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4459 | Employment | 10/03/2005

Low wage laundry workers in San Leandro, California won a landmark lawsuit on September 23, 2005 when an Alameda County judge Stephen Brick upheld their living wage claim against the nation's largest uniform giant, Cintas Corporation.

In what is believed to be the first ruling of its kind over living-wage laws, Superior Court Judge Steven Brick denied claims by Cintas that the ordinance was unconstitutional and ordered the company to pay $805,243, plus $300,000 in interest. The decision requires Cintas, the Cincinnati based uniform rental giant, to pay more than $1 million in interest and back wages to 219 workers who washed and sorted uniforms, towels and mats between 1999 and 2003 at the company's San Leandro and Union City plants.

The workers' suit was based on the city of Hayward's living wage ordinance, which requires that companies that have city contracts of $25,000 or more pay their employees a living wage based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index.

The Hayward law was passed in 1999, and later that year, Cintas signed a $105,000 contract to wash towels and uniforms for Hayward city workers. The law requires companies that do business with the city to pay their workers a minimum wage of $9.26 per hour plus health insurance, or $10.71 per hour for those who don't get health benefits.

In 2003, Nelva Hernandez, 45, of San Leandro and 35-year-old Francisca Amaral, who work at Cintas' San Leandro laundry plant, filed a class-action lawsuit against the company, saying that they and as many as 50 other workers were paid less than the city law required. "For me, it's a victory," said Nelva Hernandez. "The message to workers is they have to fight and don't be afraid. The message to companies is don't step on the workers."

About 20 California cities have living wage ordinances, including Oakland, Berkeley, Richmond and San Francisco. More than 130 cities and municipalities nationwide have enacted living wage laws tied to government contract eligibility.

During a typical production shift at the Cintas San Leandro facility, employees would unload dirty uniforms, towels and mats, hang 1,500 uniforms to dry and sort uniforms for delivery.

In two separate contract renewal agreements before the suit was filed, Cintas agreed in writing to comply with Hayward's ordinance. Hayward reprimanded Cintas with a "violation chargeable as an infraction," but the real teeth in the law proved to be a provision that gives employees a "private right of action" to ask the court to enforce the ordinance. After the workers filed suit, Hayward intervened to defend its living wage ordinance.

In 1999, Hayward's living wage rate was $9.25 per hour, or $8 per hour if the employer provided health care benefits. At the time the suit was filed in 2003, the wage had risen to $10.71. Today, in 2005, the rate is $11.50 per hour without employer benefits.

In November, Judge Brick designated a class of about 220 workers in the case. "The award will be split among the group based on how long individuals worked at Cintas from 1999 to 2003" said an attorney for the plaintiffs.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A group of 15 United Airlines employees filed a federal lawsuit against the Air Line Pilots Association union for discriminating against nonunion pilots. According to the complaint, the ALPA union hierarchy purposefully and illegally failed to inform nonunion employees of their right to sell future United stock shares issued during the airline's bankruptcy reorganization plan.
 
Laborers employed by Florida based Land-Ron, Inc. have filed a class action lawsuit claiming that the company routinely requires its employees to work hours in excess of 40 per week without receiving overtime. The complaint alleges that this denial of overtime violates the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs seek an award of the unpaid overtime together with interest, costs and other damages.
 
According to a class-action lawsuit filed in Miami, the financial department of Dell violated federal anti-discrimination laws by denying loans to Hispanics who do not speak English. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of businessman Juan Carlos Arteaga, alleging violations of the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Arteaga's attorney is seeking an injunction against Dell to prevent the company from discriminating on the basis of language to other potential customers as the case is pending.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Nical of Palm Beach. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former "field supervisors", who since May 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Outreach Senior Healthcare, Inc. and Outreach Programs, LLC. The action is brought on behalf of all Florida residents who are either currently, or have been since January 2, 2001, employed by Outreach Senior or Outreach Programs and were not paid overtime compensation. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory, compensatory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must voluntarily "opt-in" to the case in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants in this case.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in Northern District Court of Illinois against Rossi Real Estate Corporation. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.