Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Hospital Bill Over Toenail Charges Prompts Lawsuit

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4425 | Drugs / Medical | 09/16/2005

A lawsuit challenging a hospital's $1,133 bill to clip a toenail and run tests has been certified as a class action that could include other patients charged similar fees by the hospital.

Lori Mill is challenging a $418 fee included in the bill for "miscellaneous hospital charges" because she had her toenail clipped to check for fungus at Virginia Mason Medical Center's downtown complex rather than at one of its other clinics.

Mill's lawyer said the hospital has not yet provided how many patients were assessed such a fee.

Virginia Mason Medical Center says its downtown complex is authorized by Medicare to charge higher fees because it is licensed as a hospital. It maintains that such charges are standard practice elsewhere.

Judge Gregory Canova said the main question is whether those charges were properly disclosed, or were unfair or deceptive.

If Virginia Mason loses, the state Consumer Protection Act allows triple damages of up to $10,000 per patient who provides documentation of such a billing.

Mill's attorney has obtained internal emails showing Virginia Mason doctors and staff have complained about the charges, court filings show.

One unidentified doctor who had a procedure on his own toe at the downtown complex emailed Virginia Mason chief executive last year after being billed $1,200, including a facilities charge of $1,138.

"I call it obscene," the doctor fumed. "There has to be some sense of appropriateness or fairness or reasonableness to our charges."


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Drugs / Medical Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against specialty pharmaceutical company American Pharmaceuticals Partners, Inc. (Nasdaq: APPX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 19, 2002, and September 24, 2003.
 
In the wake of Merck’s worldwide recall of the pain medication Vioxx, a growing number and variety of legal actions have been filed against the embattled pharmaceutical giant. This latest is brought under the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Participants in Merck’s employee stock purchase plans say the company’s attempts to cover up the health risks of Vioxx, followed by the eventual recall of the drug, decimated the value of their company stock purchases. The plaintiffs seek damages for the lost value of their stock.
 
A Celebrex/Bextra/Mobicox Class Action was launched against the drug company giant Pfizer for Canadian residents.
 
Insurance laws vary highly from state to state, and consumers should use every available resource to know those laws. A Florida class action has been filed against Allstate Indemnity Company and affiliate Deerbrook Insurance Company on behalf of insurance policyholders who allege that the companies wrongfully denied coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams in violation of policyholder's personal injury protection (PIP) policies and Florida law.
 
If doctors overcharge your insurer, you will eventually end up paying for it through higher premiums. A class action has been filed against biotechnology business MedQuest Associates, Inc. on behalf of Georgia patients who allege that the company makes exclusive deals with doctors to induce the doctors to refer their patients to MedQuest imaging centers in violation of state insurance law.
 
Several class actions have been filed against hospital management company Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE:UHS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 21, 2003, and February 27, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.