|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 4409 | Miscellaneous | 11/29/2006
Las Vegas Lawyers filed a class action lawsuit on May 19, 2005, on behalf of hundreds of Vegas Grand condominium purchasers against the developers of the Vegas Grand condominiums, citing the developers unilaterally cancelled the purchasers' agreements in a letter dated April 25, 2005.
The class action lawsuit was was expanded on May 27, 2005 by the filing of a First Amended Complaint, adding new legal theories to the case against developers of the Las Vegas property. The addition of the amended complain added six additional named class representatives. The new amended complaint allows additional law firms to join the legal team to represent defrauded purchasers. On May 27, 2005, three law firms were added to the team, including a prominent Las Vegas law firm and two California firms. All three firms seek to associate into the class action as additional counsel on behalf of the defrauded purchasers.The two California firms represent many of the California residents that purchased Vegas Grand condominiums. The new complaint seeks to repeal any intended agreements resulting from purchasers signing a “Deposit Option Form” that was included with the developers cancellation letter, dated April 25, 2005. The developer's letter offered purchasers only two options- to sign a new reservation agreement at almost double the original price, or to receive their deposit money back with a 5% “bonus.” “Many of the purchasers signed the form because there were no other options presented and the developer did not promise in the letter to refund their deposits without the Deposit Option Form being signed. The purchasers were presented only two options, sign up at a new price, or sign to obtain their money back,” said one of the attorneys representing purchasers. Many purchasers report receiving checks from the Nevada Title Company intending to refund their reservation deposits since the filing of the class action lawsuit. “We advise purchasers not to cash or deposit the refund checks, without first seeking legal advice,” said one of the plaintiff attorneys.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Miscellaneous Cases of Interest The energy blackout that hit the eastern portion of the U.S. on August 14, 2003, was the largest in history. A class action has been filed against energy company FirstEnergy Corporation on behalf of all persons and entities residing in the United States who lost electrical power during that blackout, alleging that the company acted in reckless disregard of industry practice. Ohio University has been sued by two graduates whose Social Security numbers were among more than 173,000 possibly stolen in five instances of data theft from school computers since March 2005. Donald Jay Kulpa, 31, of Cincinnati, and Kenneth Neben, 34, a former Columbus resident now living in North Bergen, N.J., argue their right to privacy has been violated. A class action lawsuit has been filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against Conseco LLC. The case involves allegations of fraud. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. The San Jose, California tour company formerly known as SunTrips has left many would-be travelers and travel agents empty-handed. Vacationers and travel agents are out millions of dollars since the company that arranged low-cost charter tours to vacation spots like Mexico and Hawaii canceled tours and stopped offering flights. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") announces that shareholders of Plexus Corp. ("Plexus" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:PLXS - News) who purchased shares or other securities of the Company between January 25, 2006 and July 27, 2006 (the "Class Period"), have until August 24, 2007 to move for appointment as Lead Plaintiff in a securities fraud class action lawsuit currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No class has yet been certified in this action. A California jury as reached a nearly $1 billion verdict in a class action filed against Bank of America, NA, on behalf of Californian Social Security recipients who had their direct deposit accounts tapped to pay the bank overdraft and other charges between August 1994 and December 2003. The action alleged that the bank violated state law by assessing the charges even though the recipients’ Social Security payments were directly deposited into their accounts. No money will be distributed until all appeals have been exhausted. |
IT'S FREE
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
