Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Lazard Ltd.

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4342 | Stocks | 07/12/2005

A class action has been filed against Lazard Ltd. (NYSE:LAZ), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 04, 2005 and May 12, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Several purported shareholder class action lawsuits have been filed against Lazard, Goldman Sachs & Co (“Goldman”) (the lead underwriter of the IPO), and certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging the defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing a materially false and misleading Registration and Prospectus in connection with the Company’s IPO, which was priced at $25 per share, and continuing to conceal material facts about the true value of the Company’s stock price after the stock began to trade on the open market.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Registration Statement/Prospectus failed to disclose, among other things, that: (a) the basis for the $25 price for shares sold in the IPO was to enable defendant, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to raise sufficient funds to gain control of the Company from Michel David Weill (“David Weill”), a cousin of the Company’s founders; (ii) that prior to the IPO, market demand had indicated that the proper price for the IPO was only $22 per share; (iii) that to “create a market” and thereby manufacture an appearance that Lazard’s IPO was fairly and properly priced, Goldman arranged to sell millions of shares to hedge funds with side agreements that they could immediately “flip the shares” and that Goldman would immediately buy them back; (iv) that the Prospectus had failed to adequately and fully comply with S-K Item 505 which requires a prospectus to describe “the various factors considered in determining the offering price” when common shares without an established public trading market are being registered; and (v) that, in violation of Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, the Registration Statement/Prospectus failed to disclose that the Company’s deputy Chairman in Europe and a major rainmaker of new business for the Company, who had only supported the IPO because of a promise (which was later reneged on) that he would be appointed as head of Lazard’s European operations, was likely to leave Lazard and/or cause turmoil within the organization as he opposed the IPO and opposed the Company’s CEO’s purchase of David Weill’s shares.

The complaint further alleges that on or around May 12, 2005, only days after the IPO, and right after Goldman stopped buying back the Company’s shares, the price of the Company’s shares plunged from $25 per share to less than $21 per share.

If you bought Lazard Ltd. securities between May 04, 2005 and May 12, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

The parties have reached a $90 million settlement in an enforcement action filed by the SEC against mutual fund manager Pilgrim Baxter & Associates, Ltd., on behalf of stockholders who purchased the company’s mutual funds between 1996 and December 2001. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Prestige Brand Holdings, Inc. (PBH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 09, 2005 and July 28, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $4.88 million partial settlement of a class action filed against FPA Medical Management, Inc. and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's securities between February 3, 1997, and May 14, 1998. To recover under the settlement, a completed proof of claim postmarked no later than November 25, 2003, must be mailed to the claims administrator.
 
A class action has been filed against Andrx Corporation (ADRX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 9, 2005 and September 5, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
According to a law firm press release, a class action was filed against real estate developer Perini Corporation. The complaint charges Perini and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Perini and its subsidiaries offer general contracting, construction management, and design-build services to private clients and public agencies worldwide.
 
A class action has been filed in the Western District Court of Oklahoma against Dobson Communications, a wireless communications services provider, (NASDAQ: DCEL) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 19, 2003 and August 9, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.