Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Stockholders File Lawsuit Against Possis Medical, Inc.

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4309 | Stocks | 06/17/2005

A class action has been filed against Possis Medical, Inc. (NasdaqNM:POSS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 24, 2002 and August 24, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Several purported shareholder class action lawsuits have been filed against Possis and certain of the Company's executive officers with violations of federal securities laws. Plaintiff claims defendants' omissions and material misrepresentations during the Class Period artificially inflated Possis' stock price, inflicting damages on investors. Possis develops, manufactures, and markets medical devices, including the AngioJet System - a non-surgical, minimally invasive catheter system designed to rapidly remove blood clots using a stream of water.

Specifically, the Complaint alleges that during the Class Period defendants failed to disclose and/or misrepresented material adverse facts, including that: (a) the AngioJet System, the Company's key product, was not more effective than existing alternatives, including competing drug therapies, nor did AngioJet reduce significant procedural complications or significantly increase positive benefits such as improved blood flow or other similar effects; (b) the AngioJet could not be expanded as a "technology platform" because AngioJet was not in the first instance effective for routine use in a broad range of heart attack patients to reduce the size of a patient's damaged tissue area; and (c) as a result of the foregoing problems, Possis could not maintain its projected revenue growth or achieve sustained revenue growth targets as high as 35%.

The Complaint further alleges that defendants were motivated to and did conceal the true safety and efficacy of AngioJet, and defendants' ability to expand and develop Possis' AngioJet technology, because it enabled defendants to artificially inflate the price of Possis shares and then allowed defendants and other Company insiders to sell more than 361,730 shares of their privately held Possis stock to the unsuspecting public for proceeds in excess of $7.07 million while in possession of material adverse, non-public information about the Company.

On or around August 24, 2004, it was disclosed that AngioJet failed to demonstrate clinical superiority in the majority of heart attack patients, causing Possis' share price to plummet more than 38%. As a result, the Company lost almost 40% of its market capitalization after Possis shares traded down more than $11.75 per share, to $19.00 per share, as defendants lowered the Company's 2005 earnings and revenue guidance.

If you bought Possis Medical, Inc. securities between September 24, 2002 and August 24, 2004, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against electric utility Gexa Corporation (Nasdaq:GEXA) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 14, 2003, and March 30, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
On March 11, 2008, a motion to appoint certain individuals as lead plaintiffs, lead counsels and for consolidation of all related cases was filed. Just as quickly, a proposed order in regards to appointing lead plaintiffs, lead counsesl and for consolidation of all related cases was entered on March 7, 2008. As a result, an order granting motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsels was filed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on April 25, 2008.
 
A class action has been filed against Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (TERN), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 28, 2004 and March 1, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against CIB Marine Bancshares Inc. (CIBH.PK), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 27, 1999 and August 01, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Mergers often strengthen a corporation, but sometimes hurt stockholders and the public. The class has been certified in an action filed against the Minnesota Corn Processors (MCP) Board of Directors on behalf of all individuals holding MCP Class A shares prior to September 5, 2002, and the who had the right to vote in connection with the 2002 $400 million merger between MCP and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM). The action alleges that the Board hid the fact that they were profiting from the merger illegally while shareholders would only make a fraction of what their shares were worth in the transaction.
 
A class action has been filed against commercial banking and wealth management firm Gold Banc Corporation (Nasdaq:GLDB) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who owned the company's common stock as of February 25, 2004, the time of the company's acquisition agreement by Silver Acquisition Corporation. The actions claim that the defendants violated their fiduciary duties by permitting directors who had substantial restricted holdings to cash out their shares too early, and accepting a sale price that did not provide an adequate premium to public shareholders.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.