Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Orange 21, Inc. Violates the Securities Act of 1933

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4268 | Stocks | 04/05/2005

A class action has been filed against Orange 21, Inc., (NasdaqNM:ORNG), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 14, 2004 and December 14, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Orange 21 Inc. designs, develops and markets premium products for the action sports and youth lifestyle markets. Its principal products, sunglasses and goggles, are marketed under the brand Spy Optic. The Company's product matrix consists of seven product categories, including fashion sunglasses, women-specific sunglasses, performance sport sunglasses, snow goggles, motocross goggles, apparel and accessories.

According to a press release dated March 24, 2005, the complaint charges Orange 21 and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. Orange 21 designs, develops and markets premium products for the action sports and youth lifestyle markets. Its principal products, sunglasses and goggles, are marketed under the brand Spy Optic. The complaint alleges that on December 14, 2004, Orange 21 accomplished its IPO of 3.48 million shares at $8.75 per share (including 2.48 million shares sold by Orange 21 and 1 million shares sold by No Fear, Inc.) for net proceeds of $20.2 million to Orange 21 and $8.1 million to No Fear, pursuant to the Registration Statement. The Registration Statement failed to disclose that Orange 21 was engaging in copyright infringement and that its European operations were underperforming and would have to be restructured, which costs would adversely affect 2005 results.

The complaint further alleges on or around February 17, 2005, Orange 21 announced reduced earnings expectations for 2005 due in part to changes in its European infrastructure. As a result of this news, Orange 21’s stock price collapsed to around $6.00 per share. Subsequently, on or around March 7, 2005, Orange 21 disclosed it had received a cease-and-desist letter from Oakley, Inc. In response, the Company would be required to make changes based on the alleged infringements.

Specifically, the complaint alleges the Registration Statement omitted the following: (a) the Company’s European operations were underperforming and lacked the requisite infrastructure necessary to perform consistent with defendants’ representations and expectations and that as a result the Company would need to restructure these operations and incur material costs, thereby materially adversely affecting the Company’s operating performance for 2005; (b) the Company was violating patents and trademarks associated with its key product, fashion frames, and that the Company would halt the production of certain products, including the New Meteor New Espador and 42 fashion frames; and (c) the Company was modifying its distribution policies which necessarily would increase the Company’s cost structure and erode the Company’s margins and net income by $700,000 for FY 2005.

If you bought Orange 21, Inc. securities between December 14, 2004 and December 14, 2004, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

The parties have reached a $1.35 million settlement in an administrative proceeding filed by the SEC against certain former officers and directors of software company First Virtual Communications, Inc., (Nasdaq: FVCXE) on behalf of stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 28, 1999, and April 6, 1999. The action claimed that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Claim forms must be postmarked on or before September 21, 2004, to be considered valid.
 
The complaint charges certain officers and directors of the underwriter Credit Suisse, as well as credit ratings institutions Moody's and DBRS with misleading investors in regards to the risk levels of Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates.
 
A class action has been filed against Pilgrim Baxter & Associates, Ltd. and certain of its affiliated companies on behalf of investors who purchased shares in any PBHG mutual fund between November 13, 1998, and November 13, 2003. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
The class has been certified in an action filed against Kmart Corporation board members and executives on behalf of current and former Kmart employees who had more than $100 million of the discount chain's stock in their 401(k) retirement plans when the company went bankrupt. The action alleges that the defendants violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by abrogating their fiduciary duties to plan participants. Persons eligible to take part in the action should contact attorneys for the class.
 
A class action has been filed against America Service Group, Inc. (ASGRE), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 24, 2003 and March 16, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Companies that have allowed market timing trading have been in the news lately. Several class actions have been filed against global professional services firm Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MMC) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 3, 2000, through November 3, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.