Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Class Action Against EchoStar Dismissed

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4260 | Stocks | 03/28/2005

A class action has been filed against EchoStar Communications Corporation (NasdaqNM:DISH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 10, 2004 and March 09, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

EchoStar Communications' DISH Network serves up fare that whets almost everyone's entertainment appetite. The company is the #2 US direct broadcast satellite (DBS) TV provider, behind DIRECTV, with the DISH Network providing programming to more than 11 million subscribers in the continental US. EchoStar has formed alliances with ISPs and voice communications providers such as Earthlink, Qwest, SBC, and Sprint to offer combined services. Subsidiary EchoStar Technologies develops DBS hardware such as dishes, set-top boxes, and other digital equipment, both for the DISH Network and others. CEO Charles Ergen controls the company, which has tussled with Viacom and Turner Broadcasting over programming costs.

According to a press release dated March 16, 2005, the law firm Chitwood & Harley LLP announces that it has dismissed without prejudice the securities fraud class action complaint against EchoStar Communications Corporation and certain of its directors and officers. No class had been certified in this case before its dismissal.

According to a press release dated March 11, 2005, the complaint charges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements to the market concerning EchoStar's results of operation. More specifically, the Complaint alleges that the Company's Class Period financial statements and disclosures were materially false and misleading and in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") because, among other things: (1) the Company lacked internal controls adequate to ensure that the information contained in the Company's financial reports fairly presented in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company; and (2) the Company improperly booked certain transactions with vendors and engaged in improper accounting.

The truth began to emerge on or about March 10, 2005 when the market learned that EchoStar's audit committee had launched an internal accounting probe and that the Company and the Company's Chief Executive Officer were the subjects of an SEC inquiry. According to a March 10, 2005 Reuters article, the probe relates to the booking of transactions with suppliers and consulting payments to a friend of the Chief Executive Officer. Bloomberg reported that the probe by EchoStar's audit committee was prompted by KPMG's audit of the Company and that the SEC inquiry concerns the Chief Executive Officer's role in to the Company's accounting. Bloomberg cited unnamed sources familiar with the internal investigation who claimed that the investigation had uncovered "evidence," including "company records that showed the Chief Executive Officer may have directed or authorized vendor transactions and consulting payments to an unidentified friend." The Bloomberg article also noted that since July 2004, the SEC has been examining the way EchoStar and other companies in the telecommunications industry account for subscribers. During the Class Period, several of the Individual Defendants and other officers and/or directors of EchoStar engaged in massive insider trading, which Ft.com reported last night regulators are probing.

Following the March 10, 2005 disclosure, the market price of EchoStar's common stock dropped from a high of $34.38 per share during the Class Period to as low as $28.20 per share on March 10, 2005, the lowest price at which EchoStar has traded since August 2004. Trading in EchoStar common stock on March 10, 2005 exceeded 15 million shares, which is nearly eight times the average daily trading volume for DISH common stock for the previous three months of 1.876 million shares.

If you bought EchoStar Communications Corporation securities between August 10, 2004 and March 09, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against Network Engines, Inc. (Nasdaq: NENG) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 6, 2003, and December 10, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of persons who acquired the common stock of EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("EPIX" or "Company"), between July 10, 2003 and January 14, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period").
 
A class action has been filed in the Central District Court of California against Hienergy Technologies, Inc., a California based chemical technology company, (HIET.OB), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 22, 2002 and July 8, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against pet pharmaceutical company PetMed Express, Inc. (Nasdaq:PETS), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 18, 2003, and July 26, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC hereby gives notice that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Vonage Holdings Corp. ("Vonage" or the "Company") (NYSE: VG). If you would like to discuss this action or have any questions about this notice or your rights, please contact us via telephone at (866) 467-1400.
 
According to a press release dated October 29, 2008, the Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants knew or recklessly disregarded that their public statements concerning defendant's business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants' public statements were false and misleading or failed to disclose or indicate the following:(1) that the defendant's orders and sales were slowing; (2) slowing sales were causing the defendant's inventory of outdated machinery to grow; (3) that the Company failed to timely record an impairment in the value of its inventory; (4) as a result, the Company's financial results were materially inflated; and (5) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.