Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. Violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4235 | Stocks | 03/17/2005

A class action has been filed against Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (NYSE:SHU), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 09, 2001 and March 26, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. is a large owner and operator in the worldwide self-storage industry, with over 620 properties under management in 22 states, as well as Belgium, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark and Germany.

According to a press release dated January 20, 2005, a securities class action was commenced on behalf of shareholders who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. The action charges that Shurgard and one or more of its officers and/or directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants materially misled the investing public by issuing false and misleading statements regarding the business and financial results of Shurgard. More specifically the complaint alleges: i) the Company lacked sufficient internal controls and therefore was unable to ascertain its true financial standing; ii) the Company's U.S. owned entities should have been accounted for using a consolidated accounting method since the inception of each entity; iii) the Company's European operations incurred operating losses which were not supported but sufficient evidence of future profitability to recognize loss carry forwards; iv) net income for 2001, 2002 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003 had been seriously overstated due to the improper accounting for the Tax Retention Operating Lease; v) because of these errors, the value of the Company's balance sheet and income statement had been materially overstated at all relevant times; vi) Shurgard's quarterly and annual filings and press releases had not conformed to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), and; vii) at the time the Company presented its earnings guidance, it knew or should have known that it had no adequate basis to make those statements.

On March 26, 2004 Shurgard began to reveal the extent of its accounting irregularities by announcing that it would be unable to file its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. It further stated that as a result of its audit process certain accounting adjustments having a material effect on reported financials would have to be made. Then on May 17, 2004, Shurgard announced that management had reviewed previously reported historical financial data and related descriptions for certain accounting errors. Shurgard announced that it had conducted a re-audit of the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 and for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30, 2003 and 2002 as well as the quarter ended December 21, 2002. It also indicated that it had incorrectly assessed certain accounting policies applied to its consolidated financial statements which were required to be restated. In addition, the Company's newly appointed auditors, PricewaterhoseCoopers, had identified other accounting errors impacting prior periods which were required to be restated. As a result, Shurgard's shares fell to $33.30 per share in response to the news that the Company's previously-reported financial results, which had already been restated, may not in fact be what they seemed.

If you bought Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. securities between May 09, 2001 and March 26, 2004, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

According to a press release dated November 7, 2008, the lawsuit asserts claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. The Complaint alleges that defendants made misstatements and omissions of material fact relating to an investment in Lehman Principal Protection Notes and deceived investors as to the risks of investing in those Notes. The Complaint further alleges that UBS offered and sold Lehman Principal Protection Notes as suitable for investors seeking to protect their entire principal investment.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $15.25 million settlement in a class action filed against sportswear company Ashworth, Inc., (Nasdaq:ASHW) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 4, 1997, and July 15, 1998. A claims deadline had apparently not yet been set as of July 9, 2004. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys for the class for more information.
 
Several class actions have been filed against hotel company CNL Hospitality Properties, Inc. (unlisted, NYSE:CHO), and certain of its officers and directors by: (1) all persons who were entitled to vote on the proxy statement filed with the SEC by the company dated May 7, 2004; and (2) all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired CNL securities between August 16, 2001, and August 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to a law firm press release, the complaint charges NextWave and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. NextWave is a mobile broadband and multimedia technology company that develops, produces and markets mobile multimedia and wireless broadband products.
 
The class has been certified in a class action filed against food processor Tyson Foods, Inc., and certain of its officers and directors, consisting of all persons who purchased IBP, Inc., common stock on or before March 29, 2001, and subsequently sold them between March 30, 2001, and June 15, 2001. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to the complaint, as a direct result of the market learning of defendant's misrepresentations and omissions, the price of Lehman Brothers shares declined and plaintiff and the class suffered a loss on their investments in Lehman Brothers.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.