Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

OfficeMax, Inc. Stockholders Claim Financial Results Were Materially Inflated

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4234 | Stocks | 03/17/2005

A class action has been filed against OfficeMax, Inc. (NYSE:OMX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 22, 2004 and January 11, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

OfficeMax Incorporated is active in the areas of business-to-business office product solutions and retail office products. The Company provides office supplies and paper, print and document services, technology products and solutions and furniture to large, medium-sized and small businesses and consumers. OfficeMax customers are served through direct sales, catalogs, the Internet and nearly 1,000 superstores.

According to a press release dated January 13, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of all securities purchasers of OfficeMax Incorporated. The action charges that OfficeMax and certain of its present and former executive officers violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements to the market which had the effect of artificially inflating the market price of the Company's securities.

More specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company failed to disclose and misrepresented the following material adverse facts which were known to defendants or recklessly disregarded by them: (1) that certain employees of the Company fabricated supporting documentation for approximately $3.3 million in claims billed to a vendor of OfficeMax during 2003 and 2004; (2) that the Company improperly timed the recognition of recorded rebates and other such payments from vendors; (3) that the Company's financial results were in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"); (4) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls; and (5) that as a result of the above, the Company's financial results were materially inflated at all relevant times.

If you bought OfficeMax, Inc. securities between January 22, 2004 and January 11, 2005, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit, then you are invited to call (866) 467-1400 to speak with an attorney.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against healthcare services company Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation (formerly NYSE: COL) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 8, 1994, and March 19, 1997. The company is now known simply as HCA Inc. (NYSE: HCA).
 
The parties have agreed on a settlement in several class actions that had been filed against Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB:VAPH; formerly Nasdaq:VAPH) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 11, 2003, and March 31, 2004. The actions claimed that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
If you've purchased FAO stock, you may be entitled to claim money in a settlement for $2,225,000. A hearing will be held before the Honorable Michael W. Baylson, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 601 Market Street, in a courtroom posted on the Court's schedule, Philadelphia, PA 19106 at 4:00 p.m., on May 16, 2005 to determine whether the proposed settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and to consider the motion of Plaintiffs' Counsel for attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses.
 
A class action has been filed against (NYSE:MBI), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 05, 2003 and March 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
On March 14, 2008, a consolidation order was entered. As a result, an order closing consolidated cases for statistical purposes was entered on March 20, 2008. In addition, several motions to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels were filed on April 08, 2008 by different groups and individuals. Just as quickly, several proposed orders in regards to the previous motions to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels were also entered on April 08, 2008. The case continues with several responses in support of the existing motions to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels by different groups and individuals, which were filed on April 25, 2008. At the same time, on April 25, 2008, a motion to continue and motion for administrative relief pursuant to civil local rule 7-11 was filed. Hence, a proposed order in response to the motion to continue and motion for administrative relief filed earlier was entered on April 25, 2008. On May 09, 2008, a deadline was set and an order was entered in the matter of allowing different groups to file a supplemental reply in regards to the continuous hearing on motions to appoint lead plaintiffs. As different notices and responses were filed continuously after the deadline has been set, the court made its final order on May 27, 2008, granting and denying different groups and individuals as lead plaintiffs and counsels.
 
A class action has been filed in the Northern District Court of Illinois against Office Max Inc, (NYSE:OMX) a multinational contract and retail distributor of office supplies, paper, technology products and office furniture, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 9, 2004 and January 11, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.