Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Norwegian Cruise Line’s Boats Allegedly Fail to Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4208 | Civil Rights | 03/01/2005

When Doug Spector took a Norwegian Cruise Line vacation in 1998, he never imagined his experience would spark a Supreme Court case with international impact.

But on February 28, 2005, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Spector's case against the cruise line, deciding whether foreign-flagged cruise ships are subject to U.S. anti-discrimination laws.

Spector, 45, who has used a motorized scooter since the removal of a spinal tumor seven years ago left him unable to walk, said even though he and his wife paid extra for a handicapped-accessible cabin, the cabin's restroom was too small and had a foot-high step into the cabin's bathroom and a 6-inch step up to the shower.

"One foot is about a mountain when you're in a scooter or wheelchair," said Spector, who was also unable to access the ship's main bathrooms, some of the ship's facilities, all of the excursions and some ports of call. "It becomes one long, five-day, frustrating boat ride."

Alleging violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which bans discrimination against the disabled in "any place of public accommodation," Spector and four others filed a class action suit against the Malaysian-owned cruise line, whose ships sail under the Bahamian flag.

A federal court in Texas found in their favor, ruling that Title III applies to foreign ships in U.S. territorial waters, but the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, citing lack of evidence that Congress intended the law to apply to foreign facilities. If the Supreme Court denies plaintiffs’ appeal, the 5th Circuit decision will stand and the case will be dismissed.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Civil Rights Cases of Interest

A statewide class action has been filed in Connecticut against collection specialist, Peter Roberts and Associates, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Connecticut residents from whom Roberts attempted to collect allegedly illegal collection fees in connection with an attempt to collect an outstanding debt. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and is based upon Connecticut consumer laws. The consumers are seeking compensatory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A collective action has been filed in South Carolina against the Richland School District Two. The action is brought on behalf of all former and current employees who have worked in excess of 40 hours a week, but who have not been paid overtime by the school district. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and is seeking back pay as damages.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against 219 South Atlantic Boulevard, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since February 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States Distict Court, District of North Dakota Court against the State of North Dakota. The case involves violations of civil rights law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action has been filed in New York against collection specialists, Global Recovery & A/R Associates, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all New York residents who received alleged misleading "form" type collection letters from Gobal Recovery. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
Federal civil rights law has as its goal equalization of the employment playing field so that all people have a fair chance at advancement. The parties have reached a tentative $1.9+ million settlement in an action filed against Kash n' Karry Food Stores, Inc. on behalf of all current and former female management and non-management associates of the company who worked at any time between June 10, 1999, and August 22, 2003, in Kash n' Karry's retail operations and completed their 90-day probationary period on or before August 22, 2003. Claims must be postmarked no later than November 21, 2003, to be considered valid.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.