Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

OSI Pharmaceuticals Seek $360M in Lost Stock Value

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4115 | Stocks | 12/27/2004

A class action has been filed in the Eastern District Court of New York against OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(NASDAQ: OSIP), a New York based biopharmaceutical company, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April, 26 2004 and November 18, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, OSI Pharmaceuticals issued false and misleading statements concerning Tarceva (a drug to treat lung cancer and the Company's flagship drug) and the survival benefits and size of Tarceva's potential market upon FDA approval of the drug. This caused OSI Pharmaceuticals' stock to trade at artificially inflated prices and allowed the Company to access the capital markets by completing a public offering of 6.9 million shares of common stock, receiving proceeds of $445 million one week before the truth about Tarceva's limited marketability would be disclosed.

On April 26, 2004 defendants announced that Tarceva had met its primary end-points and that the Company would be seeking FDA approval for Tarceva based upon its findings in its clinical trials of Tarceva. Defendants stated that the study showed that patients who took Tarceva lived on average two months longer than patients who took a placebo. Given defendants' representations that Tarceva increased survival by two months, in addition to shrinking tumors as well as lower-priced drugs already on the market, OSI Pharmaceuticals' stock soared, increasing $52.96 in one day. Throughout the Class Period, defendants continued to publicize positive findings concerning Tarceva's survival benefits, causing the stock to trade at inflated prices.
According to the complaint, defendants' statements about the survival benefits attributable to Tarceva were materially false and misleading in that they concealed that according to OSI Pharmaceuticals' own clinical trials the much touted survival benefits would be limited only to those patients whose tumors were determined to be EGFR protein positive. Importantly, the Company's internal trials indicated that Tarceva had no effect on the survival of patients whose tumors were determined to be EGFR negative. As a result, many EGFR protein negative patients could not use the drug and many more whose EGFR protein status was unknown would not be willing to pay Tarceva's high premium price.
On November 17, 2004, defendants issued and sold 6.9 million shares of the Company's stock for $445 million in proceeds. Then, on the evening of November 18, 2004, OSI Pharmaceuticals announced that the FDA had approved Tarceva for use in the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer. However, in addition to this news, the market learned for the first time about the severe limitations on the number of patients who could use Tarceva and obtain the survival benefits of the drug. This disclosure caused OSI Pharmaceuticals' stock price to decline dramatically by $6.09 per share, or 10.5%.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against American Tower Corporation (AMT), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 1, 2006 and May 24, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Delphi Corporation (NYSE:DPH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 17, 2001 and March 03, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
According to a press release dated April 10, 2008, the lawsuit claims that First Marblehead and a number of individual defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78j (b) and 78t(a) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5.
 
The complaint charges CarMax and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. CarMax is a nationwide retailer of new and used automotive vehicles. CarMax also provides customers with a full range of related products and services, including the financing of vehicle purchases through CarMax Auto Finance, the Company's own finance operation, and third-party financing providers; the sale of extended service plans and accessories; the appraisal and purchase of vehicles directly from consumers; and vehicle repair service.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division on behalf of shareholders who purchased, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock and other securities of Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom'' or the "Company'') (Nasdaq: BRCM -News) between July 21, 2005 and July 13, 2006. Broadcom and certain of its offices and directors are charged with issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements in violation of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On July 14, 2006, Broadcom announced that it would record more than $750 million in added expenses and restate its past earnings related to the illegal backdating of stock options. Prior to any news of options backdating reaching in the market, shares of Broadcom traded at slightly above $40.00 per share and, thereafter, shares traded down to approximately $27.50 per share - - a rapid decline of over 31%. Options pricing backdating occurs when options grants to senior officers or directors of public companies are made at prices lower than the trading price of the stock on the date such options are granted. The undisclosed backdating of options violates generally accepted accounting principles. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later October 12, 2006. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. If you would like to discuss your legal rights, you may e-mail or call KGS, without obligation or cost to you, or you may submit your information on this webpage to be reviewed by a lawyer. You may contact Managing Partner Lewis Kahn of KGS direct, toll free 1-866-467-1400, ext., 100, or 504-648-1850, or by email at lewis.kahn@kglg.com.
 
A class action has been filed against certain of the officers and directors of electronics services provider DDi Corporation (OTCBB: DDICQ, formerly OTCBB: DDIC and Nasdaq: DDIC) by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 19, 2000, and April 29, 2002.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.