Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Clement-Pappa Employees Sue for FMLA Violations

Report Fraud
Case ID: 4003 | Employment | 12/07/2004

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the District Court of New Jersey against Clement-Pappas Company, Inc., a New Jersey based wholesaler, for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Class members seek a declaratory judgment that the defendant's policies and practices violate the law, seek reinstatement, damages for lost income and benefits, compensation for emotional distress, anguish and humiliation, punitive and other damages, and attorneys' fees and costs.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that Alberto Ramirez worked for Clement Pappas from 1995 to 2004 as a Quality Control Technician where he checked the quality of goods before and after packaging. He had a serious medical condition which affected his ability to perform his essential job functions and requested a leave of absence from Pappas pursuant to FMLA. Instead of granting the leave for which he was allegedly qualified, Pappas terminated his employment in violation of the law. Other class members experienced similar treatment and brought this lawsuit.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Fresh Cut Lawn Service, Inc.. The case involves violations of federal labor law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
Marriott Corporation was hit by employee lawsuits on two fronts, accused of violating San Francisco's minimum-wage ordinance and of discriminating against older sales managers who failed to fit the company's purported goal of a younger, hipper image. The wage suit was filed in San Francisco Superior Court by four employees of the downtown Marriott Courtyard as a proposed class action on behalf of affected workers at all seven company-affiliated hotels in the city, including the San Francisco Marriott, the Stanford Court and the Ritz-Carlton.
 
The federal Fair Standards Labor Act requires that most hourly employees be paid overtime wages if they work more than 40 hours in a normal workweek. A nationwide class action has been filed against drugstore chain operator CVS RX Services, Inc., on behalf of current and former pharmacist employees who allege that the company has not paid them overtime for hours they work in excess of their normal 40-hour workweek, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Qualified employees should join the action as soon as possible to prevent forfeiture of benefits because of the operation of federal statutory deadlines.
 
The decision to reduce the number of federal airport security screeners has been an issue of great controversy. A class action has been filed against James M. Loy, in his capacity as administrator of the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, on behalf of older employees and union activists who allege that the administration is ignoring veterans' preference in its reduction-in-force decisions in violation of federal law and the U.S. Constitution.
 
A chemical company worker has filed a class-action lawsuit, arguing that he and thousands of fellow employees should be tested for brain tumors because of a cluster of deadly cases. The lawsuit alleges that Rohm and Haas failed to warn employees about potential toxins and carcinogens or train them in their proper handling.
 
Just because you are classified as a managerial worker does not mean that you might not qualify for overtime pay. The parties have reached a tentative $3.5 million settlement in an action filed against Borders, Inc. (apparently the proper defendant should have been the Borders Group, Inc.) on behalf of assistant managers who worked in California Borders Bookstores between April 10, 1996, and March 18, 2001. Eligible persons should contact the class attorneys for more information.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.