Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Investors of Toy Company Sue When Professional Wrestling Contract Goes South

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3953 | Stocks | 11/15/2004

A class action has been filed in the Southern District Court of New York against Jakks Pacific, Inc. (NYSE: JAKK), a California based toy company and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 1999 and October 19, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants' statements were each materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose and misrepresented the following facts:

(a) The Company had obtained the WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) license as a result of its participation in an illicit bribery scheme;
(b) The Company's success in obtaining at least one lucrative license was not reflective of the Company's ability to enter into licensing agreements through arms-length transactions but was, instead, reflective of the Company's perpetration of an unsustainable business tactic;
(c) discovery of the Company's participation in the bribery scheme would substantially impact the Company's past, present and future revenue stream from the WWE license as the terms of the license could be materially modified, or revoked in its entirety, and the Company would be exposed to significant liability in the form of damages sought by WWE;
(d) The Company's viability as an ongoing business operation would be materially impacted by potential business partners' reluctance to conduct business with an entity involved in such a bribery scheme; and
(e) The Company's revenues and earnings would have been significantly less had the Company not engaged in the bribery scheme.

News of the announcement that the WWE filed a lawsuit against Jakks caused the company's stock to drop 23 percent.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

The parties have reached a tentative $4.5 million in a consolidated class action filed against former e-commerce business solutions provider Clarus Corporation (Nasdaq:CLRS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 8, 1999, and October 25, 2000. Persons eligible take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys for the class for more information.
 
A class action has been filed against American International Group, Inc. (AIG) (NYSE:AIG), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 01, 1999 and March 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Arbinet-Thexchange, Inc. (ARBX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 16, 2004 and December 16, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The telecom market has had its ups and downs. A class action has been filed against telecommunications company Allegiance Telecom, Inc. (OTC:ALGXQ) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 24, 2001, and February 19, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Several class actions have been filed against food and beverage service company Lancer Corporation (NYSE:LAN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 2000, and February 4, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to a press release dated April 10, 2008, the lawsuit claims that First Marblehead and a number of individual defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78j (b) and 78t(a) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.