Florida Attorney Accused of Unfair Debt Collection Practices |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been filed against Attorney Arthur S. Corrales of Florida by Marie Charlys of New York for falsely representing T-Mobile in debt collection activity in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Act.
Specifically, the complaint alleges that on or about October 3, 2003, Corrales sent a collection letter to Charlys demanding payment of a debt owed to T-Mobile. The collection letter stated, "If you notify this office in writing within thirty (30) days from receiving this notice, this office will obtain verification of the debt or obtain a copy of a judgment or verification."
According to Charlys, the language fails to notify the consumer that the debt collector will mail verification documents to the consumer upon the consumer's written dispute as required by Act. In addition, the letter states, "We represent T-Mobile in connection with a debt collection matter." Charlys alleges that Corrales has not been retained by T-Mobile. Charlys seeks statutory damages, costs and attorney's fees.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest
Florida's laws protect consumers from businesses that would otherwise harm them. The parties have reached a tentative $6.9 million settlement in an action filed against automobile retailer AutoNation, Inc. on behalf of Floridians who allege that, from August 6, 1995, through October 31, 2000, the company failed to deliver correctly signed retail installment contracts in connection with the sale of new and used motor vehicles in violation of Florida's Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance and Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Acts. To recover under the settlement, you must submit a claim form no later than July 29, 2003.
California law requires that mortgage companies fully disclose all charges and fees related to the origination of a residential loan. On July 28, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' $12.6+ million settlement in a class action against AccuBanc Mortgage Corporation and National City Mortgage Company on behalf of all persons who paid document preparation, documentation or document processing fees, processing fees, administrative fees, underwriting fees or wire fees to either or both of the companies in connection with the origination of a residential mortgage in California between May 3, 1996, and April 21, 2003. A class action lawsuit has been filed in federal court against Safeco Insurance Company of America. Although originally filed in Orange County (California) State Superiof Court, the case has been removed to the federal court system at the request of the defendants. The case involves violations of federal fair credit reporting law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. Four major merchant associations have filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa, MasterCard and banks that issues credit cards in a growing battle over fees. The lawsuit alleges that some banks and credit card companies are engaging in "collusive practices" by setting credit-card interchange fees at high levels. Interchange fees are the fees that banks charge retail businesses for credit card transactions.
Several class actions have been filed against specialty finance company NovaStar Financial, Inc. (NYSE:NFI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 29, 2003, and April 8, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. A national class action has been filed in New York against Allianceone Receivables Management, Inc., formerly known as Triadvantage Credit Services, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who have received a collection letter from Allianceone or Triadvantage that contained language overshadowing the statutorily required notice to consumers of their right to dispute an alleged debt under collection. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages, injunctive and declaratory relief.
|