|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Case ID: 3757 | Credit / Debt | 10/05/2004
A class action has been filed against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., a credit reporting agency, by Steven and Melody Millett after Steven's Social Security number was stolen and used by another individual over the course of 13 years. The Milletts claim that Experian should have known that the Social Security Number was being used by more than one person and that upon being notified of the error, should have corrected their error. The lawsuit alleges negligent misrepresentation, fraud and failure to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and seeks damages and injunctive relief.
In 1989, an individual using the names Abundio P. Cuatle, Abundio Cuatle or Abundio Perez began to use Steven Millett's Social Security number in order to obtain false identification, obtain employment and insurance, pay taxes through wage withholding, and to establish and open credit accounts for homes, cars and credit with banks, credit unions, merchants and credit card companies. Shortly afterwards, the Millett's began to experience problems obtaining credit, but did not know the reason. Over the next 13 years, they continued to experience problems and eventually realized that Steven's Social Security number was being used illegally. They contacted law enforcement authorities to correct the problem. However, Experian refused to cooperate and continued disseminating false information. The Millett's allege that Experian collected and furnished information about them which was inaccurate, false, erroneous and misleading, despite notices about the alleged fraud and reported the information to consumer reporting agencies. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest A statewide class action has been filed in Indiana against the Millikan Law Office and James E. Millikan. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana residents who have had litigation initiated against them by Millikan in an effort to collect a debt. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. Merchants Decry American Express Company's Use of Market Power to Muscle Into the Credit Card Market A company that has a great deal of power in one market should not be able to legally use that power to leverage its way into other markets--this is the heart of many antitrust actions. A class action has been filed against American Express Company on behalf of merchants who accept the company's charge cards, alleging that American Express uses its market power unlawfully to force class members to accept its credit cards at excessive rates in violation of federal antitrust laws.
A class-action suit was filed in the U.S. District Court of Arizona alleging that CareMark Rx, Inc. intentionally concealed revenue in order to avoid paying certain commissions owed to consultants who marketed and sold its services. A class action has been filed against debt collection agency Enhanced Recovery Corporation on behalf of all persons with Illinois addresses, to whom a collection letter was sent between July 16, 2003, and July 16, 2004. The action alleges that the defendants violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by using deceptive trade practices in its attempts to collect a debt. A letter was sent out last July or August about the theft of personal and financial information by an employee at Certegy Check Services, Inc. A settlement has now been reached about that theft. A class action has been filed against U.S. Bank and its Indiana collections attorney, Septtimous Taylor, by Indiana residents whose mortgage is held by U.S. Bank and who, at any time since October 10, 2001, were charged foreclosure fees and court costs although foreclosure actions had not been filed in court. Additionally, the action claims that Taylor violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The action seeks restitution and compensatory and statutory damages. |
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.







