Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Morgan Stanley Accused of Misclassifying Workers to Avoid Paying Overtime

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3683 | Employment | 09/21/2004

A class action has been filed against Morgan Stanley Company, Incorporated, a global financial services company providing services on institutional securities, investment management, credit services and institutional securities, for allegedly violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by misclassifying employees as exempt and denying them overtime compensation, holding overtime compensation monies, and wrongfully deducting from the commissions of brokers. The current plaintiff is seeking to subdivide the class into four subclasses, expects the number of class members to total between 100 and 300 and seeks compensatory damages and restitution of all wages withheld.

The subclasses would consist of:
• Subclass A: those paid on a commission-only basis that worked more than 40 hours in a week, but did not receive overtime pay.
• Subclass B: those paid by salary (including salary plus commission or salary plus bonus) that worked more than 40 hours in a week or eight hours in a day, but did not receive overtime pay.
• Subclass C: those who were subject to at least one deduction from commissions or other wages, which deduction was not the result of a dishonest, willful, or grossly negligent act of the employee.
• Subclass D: those in subclasses A, B, or C who were no longer employed by Morgan Stanley at the time the lawsuit was filed.

Questions to be determined are:
• Whether the class members qualify for exempt status under the inside salesperson exemption to the FLSA
• Whether the class members qualify for exempt status under the administrative exemption to the FLSA
• Whether Morgan Stanley qualifies as a “retail or service establishment”
• The extent to which Morgan Stanley analyzed the job duties and responsibilities before classifying employees
• The number of hours per week and per day that class members are expected to work
• Morgan Stanley’s expectations of the duties and responsibilities of employees, and whether those expectations are reasonable
• Morgan Stanley’s policies and procedures on deductions from pay
• Whether Morgan Stanley’s withholding of overtime pay and wage deductions were willful
• Whether class member are entitled to civil penalties

The Complaint lists the following causes of action:

1. Restitution of Overtime Wages for members of Subclass A: Subclass members were improperly classified as exempt, often worked over 40 hours per week or eight hours per day, and did not receive overtime compensation as regulated by the FLSA. This cause of action also alleges that Morgan Stanley does not qualify for an exemption from FLSA regulations as a “retail and service establishment.”
2. Restitution of Overtime Wages for members of Subclass B: Subclass B members were improperly classified as exempt, but are non-exempt as they do not customarily and regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment in the Company’s affairs. Therefore, they should be entitled to overtime for any hours worked over 40 per week or eight per day.
3. Restitution of Wage Deductions for members of Subclass C: Morgan Stanley allegedly subjected subclass members to illegal deductions from wages that were dishonest, willful, or grossly negligent.
4. Labor Code Penalties: Class members seek several penalties applicable under the CA Labor Code.
5. Waiting Time Penalties: Class members seek waiting time penalties of up to 30 days’ pay.
6. Rest and Meal Breaks for members of Subclasses A and B: Subclass members were improperly classified as exempt and should be entitled to pay for rest and meal breaks.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of Florida against Infinity Furniture, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Western District Court of Texas against Ltd Financial Services, LP. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A collective action has been filed in Alabama against the Shelby County Board of Education. The action is brought on behalf of all former and current employees who have worked in excess of 40 hours a week, but who have not been paid overtime by Aiken County. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and is seeking back pay as damages.
 
A national collective action has been filed in Florida against Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Managers, Assistant Managers and Managers in Training who were improperly classified as exempt employees and not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damage and back pay as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
Royal Dutch/Shell Group agreed to pay about $90 million to settle a lawsuit brought by its U.S. employees after the company overstated its oil and gas reserves by 41 percent. The accord brings to about $240 million costs related to the overstatement, which led to lawsuits, criminal investigations and the ouster of Chief Executive Philip Watts. Insurance will cover $25 million of the settlement, Shell said in a statement July 12, 2005.
 
The class has been certified in an action filed against TGF Precision Haircutters, Inc., and Brelian, Inc., on behalf of all current and former TGF hair stylists and receptionists who worked at any time between September 10, 2000, and the present. The action alleges that the company violated the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and seeks damages for class members to pay them for periods that they were forced to work off the clock, plus punitive damages. Persons qualified to take part in the action must contact the attorneys for the class on or before October 19, 2004, to prevent forfeiture of benefits because of the operation of federal statutory deadlines.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.