Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

US Unwired Skewed Accounting by Signing High-Risk Customers

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3653 | Stocks | 08/31/2004

Several class actions have been filed against wireless carrier US Unwired, Inc. (OTC BB:UNWR.OB), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 23, 2000, and August 13, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The actions allege that, during the applicable period, US Unwired held direct or indirect ownership interests in five Sprint PCS affiliates: Louisiana Unwired, Texas Unwired, Georgia PCS, IWO Holdings, and Gulf Coast Wireless. US Unwired allegedly failed to disclose or misrepresented to the investing public that:

• The company was secretly increasing its subscriber base by signing up high-credit-risk customers;

• Accounting changes implemented by US Unwired were undertaken in order to conceal the company's declining revenues;

• The company had been experiencing high involuntary disconnections related to its high-credit-risk customers; and

• It had experienced lower subscription growth as a result of changes in its policies regarding high-credit-risk credit customers.

On August 13, 2002, US Unwired announced its financial results for the second quarter period ended June 30, 2002, disclosing lower than expected subscription growth. It blamed its lack of growth largely on changes in its policies regarding high-credit-risk customers. On that news, US Unwired common stock closed at $.90 per share, down 94.8% from its class period high of $17.25 per share.

If you purchased securities issued by US Unwired during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by October 11, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against liability insurer American Physicians Capital, Inc. (Nasdaq:ACAP) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 13, 2003, and November 6, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against AXT, Inc., a CA based manufacturer of semiconductor parts (NASDAQ: AXTI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 6, 2001 and April 27, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Barrier Therapeutics, Inc. (BTRX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 29, 2004 and June 29, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against biotechnology company Cerus Corporation (Nasdaq: CERS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 25, 2000, and September 3, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against OfficeMax, Inc. (NYSE:OMX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 22, 2004 and January 11, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against Lehman Brothers, Inc., the U.S. Bank Trust National Association, RBC Dain Rauscher, and Banc Of America Securities, LLC, on behalf of all persons who invested in Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Verizon New York Debenture-Backed Series 2004-1, between January 5 and May 11, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially assigning the value of the certificates. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their certificates.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.