Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Taro Pharmaceutical Hid Undisclosed Adverse Information

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3609 | Stocks | 08/10/2004

Several class actions have been filed against pharmaceutical company Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Nasdaq:TARO) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 20, 2003, and July 29, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The lawsuit alleges that, throughout the applicable period, Taro told the market that it had successfully expanded its product line to include proprietary drugs and novel drug delivery systems. Unbeknownst to investors, the company allegedly experienced undisclosed adverse difficulties that had a negative impact on its financial performance and condition. Among other things, the action alleges that Taro failed to report that it: (1) was unable to maintain profitability in its generic drug division; (2) failed to generate free cash flow from the introduction of higher margin proprietary products sufficient to offset the expense of its new product launches; (3) failed to properly record the full expense of developing new proprietary drug products; (4) made false statements that the roll-out of its new proprietary drugs would not adversely affect its near- or long-term profitability; and (5) understated the negative effects of increasing competition on its financial performance. As a result of these statements, the defendants allegedly lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Taro was operating according to plan or that it could maintain profitability in the near-term.

The truth emerged on July 29, 2004, when Taro announced a second-quarter loss of $0.31 per share, far below the company-guided analyst consensus estimate of $0.44 per share earnings. At that time, it announced that drug sales had dropped to $49.1 million from $74.8 million in the prior second quarter. On this news, Taro’s share price fell more than $11.50 per share to a new low of $18.68 per share.

If you purchased securities issued by Taro during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by October 4, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against technology company Datatec Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: DATCE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 26 and December 16, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
The class has been certified in several consolidated class actions filed against energy utility AES Corporation (NYSE:AES) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock, including those who engaged in option transactions concerning AES securities, between July 27, 2000, and November 8, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations regarding the California energy market to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Several class actions have been filed against mobile satellite communications manufacturer KVH Industries, Inc., (Nasdaq:KVHI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 6, 2004, and July 2, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against American Italian Pasta Company (NYSE:PLB), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 25, 2000 and August 09, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The parties have reached a final $8 million settlement in a class action filed against NTS Development Company. The action alleged that NTS and an affiliate company cheated investors out of millions of dollars by mismanaging limited partnerships and then repurchasing them from the investors at a deep discount, in violation of state law. Persons eligible to participate in this action should contact attorneys for the class as soon as possible.
 
A class action has been filed against Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 2, 2005 and August 16, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.