Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

‘Girls Gone Wild’ Producer Settles with FTC for $1+ Million

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3588 | Consumer Products | 08/19/2004

The parties have reached a $1,089,627 settlement in an administrative action filed against Mantra Films, Inc., and its sole shareholder, officer, and director, Joseph R. Francis (the seller of ‘Girls Gone Wild’ DVDs and videos), on behalf of all persons who bought the company's products between February 1, 2002, and June 1, 2003, and who canceled their enrollment by returning the first monthly shipment for a refund, but did not get a refund of any shipping costs. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the prosecuting attorneys for more information.

According to the FTC, beginning in December 2000, the defendants marketed ‘Girls Gone Wild’ DVDs and videos as part of continuity programs that resulted in monthly shipments of DVDs or videos to consumers who did not agree to receive them. Once consumers were enrolled in these programs, each month the defendants shipped additional, unordered videos and DVDs on a “negative-option” basis, charging consumers’ credit and debit cards for each shipment until consumers took action to stop the shipments. The defendants did not tell consumers clearly how the continuity programs operated, enrolled them without their consent, and automatically charged their debit or credit cards without their authorization for each of the unordered monthly shipments. The settlement prohibits the defendants from engaging in such conduct in the future.

The FTC’s complaint specifically charged Mantra and Francis with violating the FTC Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), and the Unordered Merchandise Statute. The complaint also charged them with violating previous Commission rulings that shipping unordered merchandise and sending communications that seek to obtain payment for, or return of, merchandise shipped without the express consent of the recipient are unfair and deceptive acts or practices. Specifically, the FTC charged that the defendants:

• failed to disclose adequately that the purchase of a video/DVD results in enrollment in a continuity program and the material terms and conditions of that program;
• misrepresented that consumers can cancel their continuity program membership at any time;
• caused charges to be submitted for payment for video/DVD shipments without the express informed consent of consumers;
• debited consumers’ checking accounts on a recurring basis without obtaining consumers’ written authorization for preauthorized electronic fund transfers from the accounts, as required by the EFTA;
• shipped unordered merchandise to consumers and sent communications seeking payment for the unordered merchandise; and
• continued to ship unordered merchandise and to seek payment for the merchandise, even after they had actual knowledge that the FTC had determined that these practices are deceptive, unfair, and unlawful based on prior cease and desist orders against other companies.

The settlement requires Mantra and Francis to obtain consumers’ informed consent before causing their billing information to be submitted for payment. They must disclose clearly and conspicuously all material terms and conditions of membership in continuity programs before enrolling consumers, and they are prohibited from misrepresenting any fact material to a consumer’s purchasing decision. The order also requires the defendants to obtain written authorization for recurring electronic withdrawals from a consumer’s checking account and to maintain procedures to avoid an unintentional failure to get such an authorization. Finally, the order prohibits the defendants from shipping unordered merchandise and attempting to obtain payment for it.

Only $548,392 of the total $1,089,627 monetary judgment will be paid to consumers who were enrolled in a continuity program with the defendants during the applicable period , and who canceled their enrollment by returning the first monthly shipment for a refund, but did not get a refund of any shipping costs. Mantra must refund the shipping costs to consumers within 60 days from the date the federal district court enters the order, and must complete the refund program within 180 days from that date. Mantra will administer the refund program and is supposed to contact eligible consumers directly.



At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") announces that shareholders of Limelight Networks, Inc. ("Limelight" or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:LLNW) who purchased shares of the Company in connection with its June 8, 2007 Initial Public Offering ("IPO") or who purchased shares thereafter in the open market, have until October 12, 2007 to move for appointment as Lead Plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. No class has yet been certified in this action.
 
A class action has been filed against Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. on behalf of South Carolina residents whose homes have an allegedly unsafe type of electrical outlet--a back plug-in outlet--manufactured by Leviton in violation of state consumer safety laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.
 
When you are charged a late fee, the fee generally has to be related to the amounts that the company has to spend collecting your payment. The class has been certified in an action filed against Cox Communications of New Orleans, Inc. on behalf of all current and former residential subscribers of Cox cable television service in Orleans, Jefferson, St. Charles, and St. Bernard Parishes who have been assessed or who have paid a late fee to Cox in connection with their cable television service. Class members do not need to take any action at the present time to remain eligible.
 
U.S. District Judge John Corbett O’Meara ruled that the city of Detroit’s anti-ticket scalping ordinance is unconstitutional and unenforceable where sellers are offering tickets to sports and concert events for face value or less.
 
A class action has been filed against Pass & Seymour, Inc. on behalf of South Carolina residents whose homes have an allegedly unsafe type of electrical outlet--a back plug-in outlet--manufactured by Pass & Seymour in violation of state consumer safety laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.
 
Mad Cow Disease is no longer a only foreign phenomenon. A class action has been filed against Quality Food Centers, a subsidiary of Kroger, on behalf Washington citizens who purchased meat that was potentially tainted with mad cow disease, and who allege that the grocery store chain should have used information gathered through its customer loyalty program or in those who purchased the beef. The beef was sold in late December 2003 at approximately 40 stores across Washington under the label of “9% Leanest Ground Beef.”
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.